Antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation after direct myocardial revascularization
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2020-35-4-49-56
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin as part of antithrombotic therapy (ATT), namely, to study the frequency of bleeding and thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after direct myocardial revascularization in combination with radiofrequency isolation of pulmonary veins.
Material and Methods. A total of 44 patients (36 men) aged 44–77 years (average age of 63.5 ± 7.8 years) with coronary heart disease, indications for direct myocardial revascularization, and AF were included in the study from 2014 to 2016. The observation period was 24 months.
Results. Warfarin was one of the components of ATT in 20 patients (48%). However, the target values of international normalized ratio (INR) within the therapeutic range for over 70% of the time were achieved only in seven patients. Two patients who were taking warfarin without achieving target INR values for 24 months suffered from ischemic stroke. One patient taking warfarin (without regular INR control) had gastrointestinal bleeding requiring hospitalization and conservative therapy; ten patients had minor bleedings (nasal and gingival bleeding). All patients, who suffered from thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and had inadequate warfarin intake, were recommended to switch to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Thirteen patients (29%) were administered with DOAC: five patients took rivaroxaban 20 mg/day, four patients took dabigatran 300 mg/day, and four patients took apixaban 10 mg/day. DOAC therapy was administered in combination with one of the antiplatelet drugs (aspirin or clopidogrel). In the case of DOAC administration, only minor bleedings were observed: one patient had hemorrhoidal bleeding and four patients had nasal bleedings, which did not require hospitalization, medical intervention, or suspension of anticoagulant therapy. There were no other adverse events in patients taking DOAC.
Conclusions. Patients administered with DOAC as a part of antithrombotic therapy after coronary bypass surgery and surgical epicardial radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins had lower incidence rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications compared with the rates in patients taking warfarin. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups due to the small sample size.
About the Authors
M. A. KirgizovaRussian Federation
Marina A. Kirgizova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Junior Research Scientist, Department of Interventional Arrhythmology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
O. R. Eshmatov
Russian Federation
Otabek R. Eshmatov, Postgraduate Student, Department of Interventional Arrhythmology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
Yu. I. Bogdanov
Russian Federation
Yuri I. Bogdanov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Doctor for X-ray Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, Department of Interventional Radiology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
R. E. Batalov
Russian Federation
Roman E. Batalov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Leading Research Scientist, Department of Interventional Arrhythmology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
S. V. Popov
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Popov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Interventional Arrhythmology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
References
1. Haim M., Hoshen M., Reges O., Rabi Y., Balicer R., Leibowitz M. Prospective national study of the prevalence, incidence, management and outcome of a large contemporary cohort of patients with incident non valvular atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1):e001486. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001486.
2. Lippi G., Sanchis-Gomar F., Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int. J. Stroke. 2020;1747493019897870. DOI: 10.1177/1747493019897870.
3. Valgimigli M., Bueno H., Byrne R., Collet J.-P., Costa F., Jeppsson A. et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J. 2018;39(3):213–260. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
4. Bokeria L.A., Aronov D.M., Barbarash O.L., Bubnova M.G., Knayzeva T.A., Laymina N.P. et al. Russian clinical guidelines. Сoronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary heart disease: rehabilitation and secondary prevention. CardioSomatics. 2016;7(3–4):5–71 (In Russ.).
5. Vohra H.A., Whistance R., Modi A., Ohri S.K. The inflammatory response to miniaturised extracorporeal circulation: a review of the literature. Mediators of Inflammation. 2009;707042. DOI: 10.1155/2009/707042.
6. Zheng A.S.Y., Churilov L., Colley R.E., Goh C., Davis S.M., Yan B. Association of aspirin resistance with increased stroke severity and infarct size. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(2):208–213. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.601.
7. Martynov A.I., Akatova E.V., Urlaeva I.V., Nikolin O.P. True resistance and pseudoresistance to aspirin. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2013;9(4):301–305 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2013-9-3-301-305.
8. Wang Y., Chen S., Shi J.W., Dong W.-G. Benefit and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Off-pump CABG: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. 2015:9(11):1–15. DOI: 10.9734/BJMMR/2015/19433.
9. Aryana A., Singh S.K., Singh S.M., O’Neill P.G., Bowers M.R., Allen S.L. et al. Association between incomplete surgical ligation of left atrial appendage and stroke and systemic embolization. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):1431–1437. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.028.
10. Chatterjee S., Alexander J.C., Pearson P.J., Feldman T. Left atrial appendage occlusion: Lessons learned from surgical and transcatheter experiences. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011;92(6):2283–2292. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.044.
11. Budera P., Straka Z., Osmančík P., Vaněk T., Jelínek S., Hlavička J. et al. Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study. Eur. Heart J. 2012;33(21):2644–2652. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs290.
12. Dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary heart disease: updated version of 2017. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;23(8):113–163 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2018-8-113-163.
13. Sulimov V.A., Golitsyn S.P., Panchenko E.P., Popov S.V., Revishvili A.Sh., Shubik Yu.V. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;4(102):1–100 (In Russ.).
14. Sulimov V.A., Napalkov D.A., Sokolova A.A. Comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2013;9(4):433–438 (In Russ.).
15. Tabl M.A. Safety and efficacy of a combination of rivaroxaban and clopidogrel in atrial fibrillation patients after acute coronary syndrome. International Journal of Heart and Vascular Diseases. 2017;5(16):22–30 (In Russ.).
16. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., Arbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomström-Lundqvist C. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2020;ehaa612. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
Review
For citations:
Kirgizova M.A., Eshmatov O.R., Bogdanov Yu.I., Batalov R.E., Popov S.V. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation after direct myocardial revascularization. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2020;35(4):49-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2020-35-4-49-56