Comparative efficacy and safety of biatrial versus left atrial ablation in the surgical treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic heart disease

Purpose. To compare the results of biatrial (BA) and left atrial ablation (LAA) performed in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) with indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Material and Methods. A prospective, randomized, single-center, blinded study was conducted on the basis Meshalkin National Medical Research Center in the period from 2016 to 2019. A total of 116 patients with long-standing persistent AF and CAD were randomized into two groups: BA + CABG group (n = 58) and LAA + CABG group (n = 58). Patients of both groups underwent CABG surgery with the chosen atrial ablation technique (LAA or BA).

Results: BA technique proved to be more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (58%) compared with isolated LAA (31%) at 24 months (p = 0.019) after surgical treatment of long-standing persistent AF with concomitant CABG.

Conclusion: BA technique was more effective than isolated LAA in the late postoperative period of 24 months.

1. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., Arbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomström- Lundqvist C. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.

2. Badhwar V., Rankin J.S., Damiano R.J. Jr., Gillinov A.M., Bakaeen F.G., Edgerton J.R. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017;103(1):329–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076.

3. Stulak J.M., Suri R.M., Burkhart H.M., Daly R.C., Dearani J.A., Greason K.L. et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation for two decades: are the results of new techniques equivalent to the Cox maze III procedure? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014;147(5):1478–1486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.084.

4. Uschner D., Schindler D., Hilgers R., Heussen N. randomizeR: An R Package for the Assessment and Implementation of Randomization in Clinical Trials. Journal of Statistical Software. 2018;85(8):1–22. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v085.i08.

5. Knuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A., Capodanno D., Barbato E., Funck-Brentano C. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

6. Calkins H., Hindricks G., Cappato R., Kim Y.H., Saad E.B., Aguinaga L. et al. Document Reviewers: 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–e160. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux274.

7. Kalybekova A.T., Chernyavskyi A.M. Comparative characteristics of biatrial and left atrial ablation in surgical treatment of long-standing persistant atrial fibrillation in patients with concomitant disease. Annals of Arrhythmology. 2019;16(4):194–203 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15275/annaritmol.2019.4.2.

8. Kalybekova A.T., Rahmonov S.S., Chernyavskiy A.M., Almazov A.A., Narcissova G.P., Mironenko S.P. Contemporary use of surgical radiofrequency ablation and coronary artery bypass in patients with long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2019;23(4):37–46 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2019-4-37-46.

9. Belley-Cote E.P., Singal R.K., McClure G., Devereaux K., Brady K., An K. et al. Perspective and practice of surgical atrial fibrillation ablation: An international survey of cardiac surgeons. Europace. 2019;21(3):445–450. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy212.

10. Hald M.O., Lauritzen D.J., Heiberg J., Juhl W., Moss E., Vodstrup H.J. Biatrial ablation vs. Pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective study. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2020;55(2):116–121. DOI: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1846775.

11. Li H., Lin X., Ma X., Tao J., Zou R., Yang S. et al. Biatrial Versus Isolated Left Atrial Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:3651212. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3651212.

12. Pecha S., Schäfer T., Yildirim Y., Ahmadzade T., Willems S., Reichenspurner H. et al. Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation after concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. J. Thorac. Cardiovas. Surg. 2014;147(3):984–988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.012.

13. Meng Z., Dong J., Jiang F. Biatrial ablation versus left atrial ablation with bipolar system in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with mitral valve disease. Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;30(1):482–485.

14. Gualis J., Castaño M., Martínez-Comendador J.M., Marcos J.M., Martín C., Estévez-Loureiro R. et al. Biatrial vs. isolated left atrial cryoablation for the treatment of long-lasting permanent atrial fibrillation. Midterm recurrence rate. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. 2016;86(2):123–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.acmx.2015.09.005.

15. Calo L., Lamberti F., Loricchio M. L., De Ruvo E., Colivicchi F., Bianconi L. et al. Left atrial ablation versus biatrial ablation for persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation: A prospective and randomized study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2504–2512. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.047.

16. Onorati F., Mariscalco G., Rubino A.S., Serraino F., Santini F., Musazzi A. et al. Impact of lesion sets on mid-term results of surgical ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;57(8):931–940. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.055.

17. Albage A., Peterffy M., Kallner G. Learning what works in surgical cryoablation of atrial fibrillation: Results of different application techniques and benefits of prospective follow-up. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011;13(5):480–484. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2011.280735.

18. McCarthy P.M., Kruse J., Shalli S., Ilkhanoff L., Goldberger J.J., Kadish A.H. et al. Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation. J. Thorac. Cardiovacs. Surg. 2010;139(4):860–867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.038.

19. Soni L.K., Cedola S.R., Cogan J., Jiang J., Yang J., Takayama H. et al. Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, but they do increase procedural morbidity. J. Thorac. Cardiovacs. Surg. 2013;145(2):356–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.091.

20. Kim J.B., Bang J.H., Jung S.H., Choo S.J., Chung C.H., Lee J.W. Left atrial ablation versus biatrial ablation in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011;92(4):1397–1404. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.066.

21. Breda J.R., Breda A.N.C.R., Ragognette R.G., Machado L.N., Neff C.B., de Matos L.L. et al. Comparison of uniatrial and biatrial radiofrequency ablation procedures in atrial fibrillation: Initial results. Heart Surg. Forum. 2011;14(5):E271–E275. DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20101119.

22. Geuzebroek G.S.C., Ballaux P.K.E.W., Van Hemel N.M., Kelder J.C., Defauw J.A.M.T. Medium-term outcome of different surgical methods to cure atrial fibrillation: Is less worse? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2008;7(2):201–206. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2007.159889.

23. Cappabianca G., Ferrarese S., Tutino C., Corazzari C., Matteucci M., Mantovani V. et al. Safety and efficacy of biatrial vs left atrial surgical ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A meta‐analysis of clinical studies with a focus on the causes of pacemaker implantation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):2150–2163. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14117.