Results of post-infarction left ventricular aneurysms surgical planning using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional modeling
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2021-36-4-67-76
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the results of surgical intervention planning using three-dimensional models based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with postinfarction left ventricular aneurysms.
Material and Methods. Two groups of patients with postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm (PLVA) were included in the study, totaling 41 patients. The first (experimental) group included 17 patients diagnosed with PLVA by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and surgical intervention planning was performed using a 3D model of the heart. The control group comprised 24 patients in whom PLVA was diagnosed by echocardiography (TTE) or ventriculography, and surgical intervention planning was performed using traditional two-dimensional slice images.
Results. Comparison of full perfusion under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) showed statistically significant differences between the groups: this parameter was 60 [56; 68] min in group 1 vs. 71 [61; 84] min in group 2, which was significantly higher (p = 0.043). There were no significant differences in total operation time (280 [265; 320] min in group 1 vs. 263 [248; 283] min in group 2, p = 0.055), overall CPB time (93 [86; 109] min in group 1 vs. 104 [83; 109] min in group 2, p = 0.653), and partial CPB time (31 [26; 39] min in group 1 vs. 27 [21; 32] min in group 2, p = 0.127).
Conclusion. The use of 3D models to support surgeons for PLVA correction makes it possible to determine the type of reconstructive surgery, practice the main stages of the upcoming intervention, and reduce the time of full perfusion under CPB during its implementation.
About the Authors
S. V. KushnarevRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Lecturer, Department of Roentgenology and Radiology with the Course of Ultrasound Diagnostics,
194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6
I. S. Zheleznyak
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Roentgenology and Radiology with the Course of Ultrasound Diagnostics,
194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6
V. N. Kravchuk
Russian Federation
Professor, 1st Department of Surgery for Advanced Training of Doctors, 194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6;
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 191015, St. Petersburg, Kirochnaya str., 41
S. D. Rud
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Lecturer, Department of Roentgenology and Radiology with the Course of Ultrasound Diagnostics,
194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6
A. V. Shirshin
Russian Federation
Radiologist, Clinic of Roentgenoradiology with Ultrasound Diagnostics, 194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6;
Postgraduate, Faculty of Control Systems and Robotics, 197101, St. Petersburg, Kronverksky pr., 49
I. A. Menkov
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Сhief of Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Сlinic of Roentgenoradiology with Ultrasound Diagnostics,
194044, St. Petersburg, Acad. Lebedeva str., 6
References
1. World Нealth Оrganization. The top 10 causes of death. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causesof-death
2. Starodubov V.I., Marczak L.B., Varavikova E., Bikbov B., Ermakov S.P., Gall J. et al. The burden of disease in Russia from 1980 to 2016: А systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10153):1138–1146. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31485-5.
3. Kokov А.N., Masenko V.L., Semenov S.E., Barbarash O.L. Cardiac MRI in evaluation postinfarction changes and its role in determining the revascularization tactics. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2014;(3):97–102. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17802/2306-1278-2014-3-97-102.
4. Sigaev I.Yu., Alshibaya M.M., Bockeria O.L., Buziashvili Yu.I., Golukhova E.Z., Merzlyakov V.Yu. et al. Current trends in the development of coronary surgery in A.N. Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery. Bull. of BCCVS for Cardiovascular Surgery “Cardiovascular diseases”. 2016;17(3):66–76. (In Russ.).
5. Contreras C.A.M., Orellana P.X., de Almeida A.F.S., Finger M.A., Rossi Neto J.M., Chaccur P. Left ventricular reconstruction surgery in candidates for heart transplantation. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019;34(3):265–270. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0087.
6. Hartyánszky I., Tóth A., Berta B., Pólos M., Veres G., Merkely B. et al. Personalized surgical repair of left ventricular aneurysm with computer-assisted ventricular engineering. Interact. Сardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2014;19(5):801–806. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu219.
7. Yan J., Jiang S.-L. Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on early and long-term outcomes of patients with left ventricular aneurysm. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;97(41):e12773. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012773.
8. Siddiqui I., Nguyen T., Movahed A., Kabirdas D. Elusive left ventricular thrombus: Diagnostic role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-A case report and review of the literature. World J. Clin. Cases. 2018;6(6):127–131. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i6.127.
9. Paul M., Schäfers M., Grude M., Reinke F., Juergens K.U., Fischbach R. et al. Idiopathic left ventricular aneurysm and sudden cardiac death in young adults. Europace. 2006;8(8):607–612. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul074.
10. Levin D., Mackensen G.B., Reisman M., McCabe J.M., Dvir D., Ripley B. 3D printing applications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Curr. Card. Rep. 2020;22(4):23. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-020-1276-8.
11. Vukicevic M., Puperi D.S., Jane Grande-Allen K., Little S.H. 3D printed modeling of the mitral valve for catheter-based structural interventions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017;45(2):508–519. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1676-5.
12. Cherniavskii A.M., Kareva Yu.E., Denisova M.A., Efendiev V.U. The problem of preoperative left ventricular modeling. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015;8(2):4–7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/kardio2015824-7.
13. Cox J.L. Surgical management of left ventricular aneurysms: a clarification of the similarities and differences between the Jatene and Dor techniques. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1997;9(2):131–138.
14. Jacobs S., Grunert R., Mohr F.W., Falk V. 3D-Imaging of cardiac structures using 3D heart models for planning in heart surgery: a preliminary study. Interact. Сardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2008;7(1):6–9. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2007.156588.
15. Radivilko A.S. Prevention of complications after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016;(3):117–123. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17802/2306-1278-2016-3-117- 123.
16. Chegrina L.V., Rybka M.M. Interrelation of increase postoperative level troponin T and a lactate with development of complications in the patients operated with application of cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2015;(1):42–48. (In Russ.).
17. Belov Yu.V., Litvickiy P.F., Vinokurov I.A. Acute renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery: Predictors, mechanisms of development and criteria for diagnosis. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2015;22(4):4–11. (In Russ.).
18. Farhoudi M., Mehrvar K., Afrasiabi A., Parvizi R., Khalili A.A., Nasiri B. et al. Neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery – an Iranian experience. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2010;6:775–778. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S14348.
19. Motallebzadeh R., Bland J.M., Markus H.S., Kaski J.C., Jahangiri M. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: randomized study of onpump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83(2):475–482. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.024.
20. Lombard F.W., Mathew J.P. Neurocognitive dysfunction following cardiac surgery. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2010;14(2):102–110. DOI: 10.1177/1089253210371519.
Review
For citations:
Kushnarev S.V., Zheleznyak I.S., Kravchuk V.N., Rud S.D., Shirshin A.V., Menkov I.A. Results of post-infarction left ventricular aneurysms surgical planning using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional modeling. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2022;37(1):67-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2021-36-4-67-76