The immediate results of surgical treatment of an ascending aortic aneurysm in conjunction with a stenotic lesion of the aortic valve
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2022-424
Abstract
Introduction. Ascending aortic aneurysms with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves have completely diff erent nature of origin. There is a large number of studies focusing on the negative effect of bicuspid aortic valve on the prognosis of this disease. However, studies regarding the impact of tricuspid aortic valve on ascending aortic aneurysms are extremely rare. In this regard, the purpose of our work was.
Aim: To analyze the early results of simultaneous surgical treatment.
Material and Methods. The retrospective study included 73 patients with aortic valve stenosis in combination with ascending aortic aneurysm. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 comprised patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic aneurysm; group 2 comprised patients with tricuspid aortic valve and aortic aneurysm. All the examined patients underwent prosthetics of the aortic valve with simultaneous prosthetics of the ascending aorta as planned. Echocardiographic parameters and multispiral computed aortography were evaluated before and after surgery.
Results. The patients were comparable in baseline characteristics. The incidence rates of acute cerebrovascular accident, respiratory failure requiring prolonged respiratory support, acute kidney injury, and bleeding requiring re-operation were 3.7 vs. 0% (p = 0.918), 1.9 vs. 0% (p = 0.492), 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.492), and 0% vs. 5.3% (p = 0.128) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no hospital mortality in any of study groups. There was no aortic valve prosthesis dysfunction in the early postoperative period.
Conclusion. Reconstructive surgeries for ascending aortic aneurysm with simultaneous prosthetics of the tricuspid aortic valve were characterized by satisfactory immediate clinical results comparable to patients with a bicuspid aortic valve.
About the Authors
B. N. KozlovRussian Federation
Boris N. Kozlov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
D. S. Panfilov
Russian Federation
Dmitri S. Panfilov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Scientist
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
B. A. Bazarbekova
Russian Federation
Botazhan A. Bazarbekova, Cardiovascular Surgeon
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
E. L. Sonduev
Russian Federation
Erdeni L. Sonduev, Cardiovascular Surgeon
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
A. M. Boiko
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Boiko, Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
References
1. Yadgir S., Johnson C.O., Aboyans V., Adebayo O.M., Adedoyin R.A., Afarideh M. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of calcific aortic valve and degenerative mitral valve diseases, 1990–2017. Circulation. 2020;141(21):1670–1680. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043391.
2. Keane M.G., Wiegers S.E., Plappert T., Pochettino A., Bavaria J.E., Sutton M.G. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation. 2000;102(19–3):III35–III39. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-35.
3. Girdauskas E., Rouman M., Disha K., Fey B., Dubslaff G., von Kodolitsch Y. et al. Morphologic and functional markers of aortopathy in patients with bicuspid aortic valve insuffi ciency versus stenosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017;103(1):49–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.085.
4. Pees C., Michel-Behnke I. Morphology of the bicuspid aortic valve and elasticity of the adjacent aorta in children. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012;110(9):1354–1360. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.043.
5. Balistreri C.R., Pisano C., Candore G., Maresi E., Codispoti M., Ruvolo G. Focus on the unique mechanisms involved in thoracic aortic aneurysm formation in bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve patients: clinical implications of a pilot study. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013;43(6):e180–e186. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs630.
6. Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Gorokhov A.S., Kuznetsov M.S., Nasrashvili G.G., Shipulin V.M. Results of radical reconstruction of thoracic aortic aneurysms using hemi-arch technique. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2016;9(1):42–46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/kardio20169142-46.
7. Otto C.M., Nishimura R.A., Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Erwin J.P., Gentile F. et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):35–71. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932.
8. Rosenhek R., Zilberszac R., Schemper M., Czerny M., Mundigler G., Graf S. et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121(1):151–156. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULA-TI0NAHA.109.894170.
9. Zajc P., Plewka M., Rogowski W., Kasprzak J.D. Ascending aortic dilatation as a late complication after implantation of a mechanical aortic valve performed 37 years earlier. Kardiochir. Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014;11(4):437–440. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2014.47348.
10. Beroukhim R.S., Kruzick T.L., Taylor A.L., Gao D., Yetman A.T. Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006;98(6):828–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.022.
11. Oladokun D., Patterson B.O., Sobocinski J., Karthikesalingam A., Loftus I., Thompson M.M. et al. Systematic review of the growth rates and influencing factors in thoracic aortic aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2016;51(5):674–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.017.
12. Russo C.F., Mazzetti S., Garatti A., Ribera E., Milazzo A., Bruschi G. et al. Aortic complications after bicuspid aortic valve replacement: long-term results. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002;74(5):1773–1776. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04261-3.
13. Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Sonduev E.L., Lukinov V.L. Ascending aortic aneurysm: Propensity score matching analysis of hemiarch and non-hemiarch replacement. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(10):179–187. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3887.
14. Mateos-Cáceres P.J., Zamorano-León J.J., Rodríguez-Sierra P., Macaya C., López-Farré A.J. New and old mechanisms associated with hypertension in the elderly. Int. J. Hypertens. 2012;2012:150107. DOI: 10.1155/2012/150107.
15. Balistreri C.R., Pisano C., Merlo D., Fattouch K., Caruso M., Incalcaterra E. et al. Is the mean blood leukocyte telomere length a predictor for sporadic thoracic aortic aneurysm? Data from a preliminary study. Rejuvenation Res. 2012;15(2):170–173. DOI: 10.1089/rej.2011.1273.
16. Belov Yu.V., Rybakov K.N., Gubarev I.A., Salekh A.Z., Vinokurov I.A. Immediate treatment results of patients with aortic valve disease in combination with poststenotic dilation of the ascending aorta less than 5 cm. Novosti Khirurgii. 2020;28(4):370–376. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18484/2305-0047.2020.4.370.
17. Milewski R.K., Habertheuer A., Bavaria J.E., Siki M., Szeto W.Y., Krause E. et al. Fate of remnant sinuses of Valsalva in patients with bicuspid and trileaflet valves undergoing aortic valve, ascending aorta, and aortic arch replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017;154(2):421–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.150.
18. Girdauskas E., Rouman M., Disha K., Key B., Dubslaff G., Theis B. et al. Functional aortic root parameters and expression of aortopathy in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67(15):1786–1796. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.015.
Review
For citations:
Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Bazarbekova B.A., Sonduev E.L., Boiko A.M. The immediate results of surgical treatment of an ascending aortic aneurysm in conjunction with a stenotic lesion of the aortic valve. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2023;38(3):135-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2022-424