Preview

Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Advanced search

SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: MODERN TREND

https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2016-31-3-23-26

Abstract

The article is devoted to analysis of modern methods of atrial fibrillation treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and coronary artery bypass grafting. Systematic review of various surgical ablation techniques and methods has been done in particular. The necessity for radiofrequency ablation modification is substantiated.

About the Authors

Yu. I. Bogdanov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


S. V. Popov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


Yu. Yu. Vechersky
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


R. E. Batalov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


V. V. Zatolokin
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Попов С.В., Антонченко И.В., Баталов Р.Е. и др. Фибрилляция предсердий: аблация или нет // Рос. мед. журнал. – 2009. – № 18. – С. 1108–1111.

2. Мазуров М.Е., Ардашев А.В., Желяков Е.Г. и др. Сопоставление результатов математического моделирования и клинических данных при радиочастотной абляции постабляционного перимитрального трепетания предсердий: определение условий формирования перимитрального re-entry // Кардиология. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 39–45.

3. Calkins H., Kuck K.H., Cappato R. et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design // Europace. – 2012. – Vol. 14. – P. 528–606.

4. Ad N., Suri R.M., Gammie J.S. et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation trends and outcomes in North America // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 144. – P. 1051–1060.

5. Maisel W.H., Rawn J.D., Stevenson W.G. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery // Ann. Intern. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 135 – P. 1061–1073.

6. Mariscalco G., Klersy C., Zanobini M. et al. Atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary surgery affects late survival // Circulation. – 2008. – Vol. 118. – P. 1612–1618.

7. Villareal R.P., Hariharan R., Liu B.C. et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – 2004. – Vol. 43. – P. 742–748.

8. Borde D., Gandhe U., Hargave N. et al. Prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: is CHA 2 DS 2 – VASc score useful? // Ann. Card. Anaesth – 2014. – Vol. 17. – P. 182–187.

9. Mariscalco G., Engstrom K.G. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with late mortality after coronary surgery, but not after valvular surgery // Ann. Thorac. Surg. – 2009. – Vol. 88. – P. 1871–1876.

10. Almassi G.H., Pecsi S.A., Collins J.F. et al. Predictors and impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on patients’ out comes: a report from the Randomized On Versus Off Bypass trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 143. – P. 93–102.

11. Jazayeri M.R., Hempe S.L., Sra J.S. et al. Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia // Circulation. – 1992. – Vol. 85. – P. 1318–1328.

12. Hoenicke E.M., Strange R.G., Patel H. et al. Damiano. Initial experience with epicardial radiofrequency ablation catheter in an ovine model: moving towards an endoscopic maze procedure // Surg. Forum. – 2000. – Vol. 81. – P. 79–82.

13. Vicol C., Kur F., Eifert S. et al. Bipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation of the posterior inferior left atrium and coronary sinus is feasible and safe // Heart Surg. Forum. – 2004. – Vol. 7. – P. 535–538.

14. Prasad S.M., Maniar H.S., Schuessler R.B. et al. Chronic transmural atrial ablation by using bipolar radiofrequency energy on the beating heart // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 124. – P. 708–713.

15. Boersma L.V.A., Castella M., van Boven WimJan et al. Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Versus Surgical Ablation Treatment (FAST) // Circulation. – 2012. – Vol. 125. – P. 23–30.

16. Sueda T., Imai K., Ishii O. et al. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation for the elimination of chronic atrial fibrillation in cardiac valvular surgery // Ann. Thorac. Surg. – 2001. – Vol. 71. – P. 1189–1193.

17. Kondo N., Takahashi K., Minakawa M. et al. Left atrial maze procedure: a useful addition to other corrective operations // Ann. Thorac. Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 75. – P. 1490–1494.

18. Geidel S., Ostermeyer J., Lass M. et al. Permanent atrial fibrillation ablation surgery in CABG and aortic valve patients is at least as effective as in mitral valve disease // Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 54. – P. 91–95.

19. Deneke T., Khargi K., Grewe P. et al. Left atrial versus bi-atrial maze operation using intraoperatively cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation in patients undergoing open-heart surgery: Safety and efficacy // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – 2002. – Vol. 39. – P. 1644–1650.

20. Castella M., Garcia Valentin A., Pereda D. et al. Anatomic aspects of the atrioventricular junction influencing radiofrequency Cox maze IV procedures // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 136. – P. 419–423.

21. Jasbir S. Prospective, randomized comparison of hybrid ablation vs. catheter ablation [Electronic resource] // Clinical Trials. – URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02344394 (дата обращения 10.06.2016).

22. Gammie J.S., Haddad M., Milford Beland S. et al. Atrial fibrillation correction surgery: lessons from the society of thoracic surgeons national cardiac database // Ann. Thoracic. Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 85, No. 3. – P. 909–914.

23. Gillinov A.M., McCarthy P.M., Blackstone E.H. et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with bipolar radiofrequency as the primary modality // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 129. – P. 1322–1329.

24. La Meir M., Gelsomino S., Nonneman B. The problem with concomitant atrial fibrillation in non mitral valve surgery // Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 3. – P. 124–129.

25. Gaynor S.L., Schuessler R.B., Bailey M.S. et al. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: predictors of late recurrence // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 129. – P. 104–111.

26. Echahidi N., Pibarot P., O’Hara G., Mathieu P. Mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – 2008. – Vol. 51. – P. 793–801.

27. Shirzad M., Karimi A., Tazik M. et al. Determinants of postoperative atrial fibrillation and associated resource utilization in cardiac surgery // Rev. Esp. Cardiol. – 2010. – Vol. 63. – P. 1054–1060.

28. Robertson J.O., Saint L.L., Leidenfrost J.E. et al. Illustrated techniques for performing the Cox Maze IV procedure through a right mini thoracotomy // Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. – 2014. – No. 3. – P. 105–116.

29. Melby S.J., Gaynor S.L., Lubahn J.G. et al. Efficacy and safety of right and left atrial ablations on the beating heart with irrigated bipolar radiofrequency energy: a long-term animal study // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 132. – P. 853–860.

30. Prasad S.M., Maniar H.S., Schuessler R.B. et al. Chronic transmural atrial ablation by using bipolar radiofrequency energy on the beating heart // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 124. – P. 708–713.


Review

For citations:


Bogdanov Yu.I., Popov S.V., Vechersky Yu.Yu., Batalov R.E., Zatolokin V.V. SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: MODERN TREND. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2016;31(3):23-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2016-31-3-23-26

Views: 747


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-2927 (Print)
ISSN 2713-265X (Online)