Preview

Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of changes in the sizes of Valsalva sinuses at medium-term follow-up after prosthetics of the ascending aorta and bicuspid/tricuspid aortic valve

https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2025-40-2-53-61

Abstract

Introduction. The issue of adequate surgical tactics in relation to the volume of aortic wall resection in aortic valve stenosis in combination with an ascending aortic aneurysm is recognized as relevant and debatable.

Aim: To compare the mid-term results of surgical reconstruction of the ascending aorta and prosthetics of the aortic valve for stenosis in patients with its bicuspid and tricuspid anatomy.

Material and Methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 102 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic valve stenotic defect was performed. All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the anatomy of the aortic valve: bicuspid (AAA + BAV, n = 75) or tricuspid (AAA + TAV, n = 27). The data analysis included an intergroup comparison of postoperative results in the near and midi-term postoperative periods.

Results. Mid-term survival of AAA + BAV and AAA + TAV patients it reached 97.4% and 100%, respectively. There were no episodes of repeated surgical intervention on the thoracic aorta. In AAA + BAV patients, a moderate increase in Valsalva sinuses was noted, and in AAA + TAV patients, a decrease in the size of the aortic root was noted in the postoperative period. Conclusion. Combined surgeriess for ascending aortic aneurysm and stenotic aortic valve are associated with satisfactory early and mid-term results, including high level of survival and freedom from surgery for up to 36 months, regardless of the anatomy of the aortic valve.

About the Authors

B. N. Kozlov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Boris N. Kozlov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery

111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012



D. S. Panfilov
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Dmitri S. Panfilov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Scientist

111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012



B. A. Bazarbekova
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Botazhan A Bazarbekova, Cand. Sci (Med), Cardiovascular Surgeon

111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012



N. O. Panfilova
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 29 named after A.A. Lutsik
Russian Federation

Natalia O Panfilova, Cand. Sci (Med), Radiologist

Botazhan A Bazarbekova, Cand. Sci (Med), Cardiovascular Surgeon



References

1. Bravo-Jaimes K., Prakash S.K. Genetics in bicuspid aortic valve disease: Where are we? Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020;63(4):398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.005

2. Kaneko T., Shekar P., Ivkovic V., Longford N.T., Huang C.C., Sigurdsson M.I. et al. Should the dilated ascending aorta be repaired at the time of bicuspid aortic valve replacement? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2018;53(3):560–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx387

3. Cave D.G.W., Panayiotou H., Bissell M.M. Hemodynamic profiles before and after surgery in bicuspid aortic valve disease-a systematic review of the literature. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021;8:629227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.629227

4. Bachet J. Open repair techniques in the aortic arch are still superior. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2018;7(3):328–344. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.05.05

5. Malakhova M.V., Khovrin V.V., Galyan T.N., Kulichkin A.S., Charchyan E.R. Unification of MSCT-study of the aorta at the preand postoperative stage of patient examination. Digital Diagnostics. 2021;2(2S):18–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/20212S218

6. Immediate results of treatment of patients with aortic valve malformation combined with poststenotic dilatation of the ascending aorta less than 5 cm. Belov Y.V., Rybakov K.N., Gubarev I.A., Saleh A.Z., Vinokurov I.A. News of Surgery. 2020;28(4):370–376. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2020.4.370

7. Sharifulin R.M., Demin I.I., Astapov D.A., Afanasyev A.V., Pivkin A.N., Ovcharov M.A. et al. Reconstruction of the aortic root at bicuspid aortic valve. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;13(3):213–223. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202013031213

8. Vrublevsky A.V., Panfilov D.S., Kozlov B.N., Saushkin V.V., Sazonova S.I. Violations of biomechanics of the ascending aorta at borderline dilation and aneurysm. Russian Cardiology Journal. 2023;28(5):53–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5365

9. Pisano C., D'Amico F., Balistreri C.R., Vacirca S.R., Nardi P., Altieri C. et al., Biomechanical properties and histomorphometric features of aortic tissue in patients with or without bicuspid aortic valve. J. Thorac. Dis. 2020;12(5):2304–2316. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.03.122

10. Borger M.A., Preston M., Ivanov J., Fedak P.W., Davierwala P., Armstrong S., David T.E. Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;128(5):677–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.07.009

11. Salihi S., Cantürk E., Köksal C., Alp H.M. Should sinus of Valsalva be replaced in patients with dilated ascending aorta and aortic valve diseases? Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018;33(6):573–578. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0093

12. Nazer R.I., Elhenawy A.M., Fazel S.S., Garrido-Olivares L.E., Armstrong S., David T.E. The influence of operative techniques on the outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve disease and aortic dilatation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010;89(6):1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.070

13. Sun J., Chen S., Sun C., Qi H., Qian X., Zheng Z. Outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic valve. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022;34(3):854–865. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.08.001

14. Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Bazarbekova B.A., Sonduev E.L., Boiko A.M. The immediate results of surgical treatment of an ascending aortic aneurysm in conjunction with a stenotic lesion of the aortic valve. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2023;38(3):135–142. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2022-424

15. Ziganshin B.A., Kargin N., Zafar M.A., Elefteriades J.A. The natural history of aortic root aneurysms [Video]. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2023;31:213–224. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-20

16. Peterss S., Bhandari R., Rizzo J.A., Fang H., Kuzmik G.A., Ziganshin B.A. et al. The aortic root: Natural history after root-sparing ascending replacement in nonsyndromic aneurysmal patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017;103(3):828–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.081

17. Milewski R.K., Habertheuer A., Bavaria J.E., Siki M., Szeto W.Y., Krause E. et al. Fate of remnant sinuses of Valsalva in patients with bicuspid and trileaflet valves undergoing aortic valve, ascending aorta, and aortic arch replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017;154(2):421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.150

18. Vendramin I., Meneguzzi M., Sponga S., Deroma L., Cimarosti R., Lutman C. et al. Bicuspid aortic valve disease and ascending aortic aneurysm: should an aortic root replacement be mandatory? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2016;49(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv069

19. Bibevski S., Ruzmetov M., Plate J.F., Scholl F.G. The impact of bicuspid aortic valve leaflet fusion morphology on the ascending aorta and on outcomes of aortic valve replacement. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2023;50(2):e217831. https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-21-7831


Review

For citations:


Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Bazarbekova B.A., Panfilova N.O. Comparative analysis of changes in the sizes of Valsalva sinuses at medium-term follow-up after prosthetics of the ascending aorta and bicuspid/tricuspid aortic valve. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2025;40(2):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2025-40-2-53-61

Views: 18


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-2927 (Print)
ISSN 2713-265X (Online)