Quality of life dynamics in cardiac surgery patients during the first year after open heart surgery: results of single center observational study
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2025-40-2-71-82
Abstract
Rationale. Improving the quality of life (QoL) as well as restoration of physical, emotional and mental functioning is the key goals of treatment in patients with coronary heart disease (CAD) and acquired heart defects (AHD). Data on terms, dynamics and features of improving various aspects of QoL after open heart surgery in these groups of patients are currently limited. In addition, the relationship between clinical and instrumental preand postoperative data and the dynamics of changes in quality of life has not been established.
Aim. To study the dynamics of QoL and the degree of satisfaction with the results of treatment in patients with CAD and AHD during 12 months after open heart surgery.
Material and Methods. Adult patients with CAD and AHD requiring surgical treatment were enrolled in the study. Before surgery, all the patients underwent a standard clinical, laboratory and instrumental examination as part of the cardiac surgical treatment protocol, supplemented by determining the level of B-natriuretic peptide (NP) before surgery and on the day of discharge from the hospital. Within 12 months after discharge from the hospital, a control echocardiographic study was performed. To assess QoL, patients filled in the RAND SF-36 and SAQ questionnaires before surgery, at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. Treatment satisfaction was assessed 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The analysis of changes in QoL after surgery was carried out using Generalized estimating equations; the time after surgery, gender, age, population of the place of residence, duration of the disease, the level of NP before surgery and the dynamics of LVEF 12 months after surgery were considered as independent variables.
Results. Totally, 189 (63.9%) patients with CAD and 107 (36.1%) patients with AHD (median age 65 years, men – 68%), who underwent open heart surgery from November 2022 to January 2024 were enrolled. The median pre-surgery NP level was 243 pg/mL in the CAD group and 812 pg/mL in the AHD group. In the vast majority of patients, the LV EF increased after 12 months (CAD, n = 49 [25.9%], AHD, n = 24 [22.4%]) or remained unchanged (CAD, n = 139 [73.5%], AHD, n = 82 [76.6%]). At 12 months after surgery, 87% of patients with CAD and 90% of patients with AHD reported an improvement in well-being; 98% of patients with CAD and 96% of patients with AHD are satisfied with the degree of elimination of symptoms of the disease. The positive dynamics of general aspects of QoL was less pronounced in both groups in men and in patients younger than 55 years; in patients with CAD – in the early postoperative period if they had no significant increase in LV EF 12 months after surgery, as well as if they had preoperative level of NP > 1200 pg/ml.
Conclusion. Significant QoL improvement in both CAD and AHD patients was observed already in 3 months after open heart surgery, with further sustained positive dynamics at 6 and 12 months. The vast majority of patients were satisfied with heart surgery. Sociodemographic factors – age, gender, population of the place of residence, as well as clinical factors – duration of the disease, baseline level of NP, dynamics of LVEF is associated with QoL changes during the first year after surgery.
About the Authors
I. S. AsadullinRussian Federation
Ilshat S. Asadullin, Cand. Cardiovascular Surgeon, Cardiac Surgery Department with the X-ray Endovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Room
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
M. S. Kamenskikh
Russian Federation
Maxim S. Kamenskikh, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Cardiac Surgery Department with the X-ray Endovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Room; Cardiovascular Surgeon
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
T. P. Nikitina
Russian Federation
Tatiana P. Nikitina, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Public Health Specialist, Department of Quality of Life Monitoring
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
T. I. Ionova
Russian Federation
Tatiana I. Ionova, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Head of the Department of Quality of Life Monitoring
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
A. A. Filippov
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Philippov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Cardiac Surgery, Department with the X-ray Endovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Room
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
S. M. Efremov
Russian Federation
Sergey M. Efremov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Director for Scientific Activities
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
D. V. Shmatov
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Shmatov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director for Medical Affairs (Cardiac Surgery)
154, Fontanka River Emb., Saint Petersburg, 190103
References
1. Bokeria L.A., Milievskaya E.B., Pryanishnikov V.V., Yurlov I.A. Cardiovascular surgery – 2023. Diseases and congenital abnormalities of the circulatory system. Moscow: A.N. Bakulev National medical research center for cardiovascular surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health; 2024:368. (In Russ).
2. Schmidt-RioValle J., Abu Ejheisheh M., Membrive-Jiménez M.J., Suleiman-Martos N., Albendín-Garcí, L., Correa-Rodríguez M. et al. Quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(22):8439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228439
3. Sanders J., Bowden T., Woolfe Loftus N. Sekhon M., Aitken L.M. Predictors of health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2022; 20:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01980-4
4. Hays R.D., Sherbourne C.D., Mazel R.M. User’s Manual for Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Core measures of health-related quality of life. RAND Corporation, 1995;MR-162-RC (available at www.rand.org)
5. Spertus J.A., Winder J.A., Dewhurst T.A., Deyo R.A., Prodzinsk J., McDonell M. et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995;25(2):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9
6. Atkinson M.J., Sinha A., Hass S.L., Colman S.S., Kumar R.N., Brod M., Rowland C.R. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2004;2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-12
7. Wang M. Generalized estimating equations in longitudinal data analysis: A review and recent developments. Advances in Statistics. 2014:303728. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/303728
8. Zenkov A.A. Life quality analysis on the application of different methods of surgical myocardial revascularization: prospective randomized trial MICSREVS. Vestnik VGMU. 2018;17(1):68–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2018.1.68
9. Dedov D., Evtyukhin I. Impact of aorto-coronary bypass surgery on quality of life and prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Vrach. 2021;32(8):79–82. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2021-08-15
10. Demchenko Е.А., Kruglova N.Ye., Shchelkova О.Yu. Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease: prognostic value and dynamics during the process of rehabilitation after coronary bypass surgery. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Serija 12. 2014;(3):69–78. (In Russ.).
11. Rijnhart-de Jong H., Haenen J., Bol Raap G., Jekel L., Vossenberg T. et al. Determinants of non-recovery in physical health-related quality of life one year after cardiac surgery: a prospective single Centre observational study. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2020;15(1):234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01273-1
12. Goruleva M.V., Ganenko O.S., Коvaltcova R.S., Kutuzova A., Petrova N.N., Demchemnko E.A. et al. Quality of life and psycho-cognitive condition in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2014;(9):68–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2014-9-68-71
13. Narkevich I.A., Nemyatykh O.D., Kovaleva K.A., Ratova L.G., Trushnikova I.O., Parizhskaya E.N., Konradi A.O. Life quality assessment of patients with stable coronary artery disease after myocardial revascularization. Pharmacy & Pharmacology. 2020;8(6):465–475. https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2020-8-6-465-475
14. Goldfarb M., Drudi L., Almohammadi M., Langlois Y., Noiseux N., Perrault L. et al. Outcome reporting in cardiac surgery trials: Systematic review and critical appraisal. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015;4(8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002204
15. Kube T., Meyer J., Grieshaber P., Moosdorf R., Böning A., Rief W. Patients’ pre and postoperative expectations as predictors of clinical outcomes six months after cardiac surgery. Psychol. Heal. Med. 2020;25(7):781–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1659986
16. Coelho P.N.M.P., Miranda L.M.R.P.C., Barros P.M.P., Fragata J.I.G. Quality of life after elective cardiac surgery in elderly patients. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2019;28(2):199–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/ icvts/ivy235
17. Sanders J., Bowden T., Woolfe-Loftus N., Sekhon M., Aitken L.M. Predictors of health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01980-4
18. Al-Ebrahim K.E., Albishri S.A., Alotaibi S.W., Alsayegh L.A., Almufarriji E.M., Babader R.B. et al. The quality of life in patients with valve prosthesis after undergoing surgery for valvular heart diseases. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43030. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43030
19. Mani K., Luttman J., Nowell J., Carrol A., Jahangiri M. Patients' expectation of postoperative course and satisfaction following cardiac surgery. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2023;105(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0137
Review
For citations:
Asadullin I.S., Kamenskikh M.S., Nikitina T.P., Ionova T.I., Filippov A.A., Efremov S.M., Shmatov D.V. Quality of life dynamics in cardiac surgery patients during the first year after open heart surgery: results of single center observational study. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2025;40(2):71-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2025-40-2-71-82