FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH ICD: IN-CLINIC INTERROGATING OR REMOTE MONITORING?
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2017-32-1-84-87
Abstract
Remote monitoring systems (RMS) are the necessary attribute of effective ambulatory follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Meanwhile, many specialists consider RMS as an addition to traditional in-clinic interrogating. In this research we compared these strategies in patients with ICDs. No differences in verification of leads failure or arrhythmias were shown. Timely notification of a physician about clinical events is an indisputable advantage of RMS.
About the Authors
E. V. Damrina
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. N. Ilov
Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Diemberger I., Gardini B., Martignani C. et al. Holter ECG for pacemaker/defibrillator carriers: What is its role in the era of remote monitoring? // Heart. – 2015. – Vol. 101(16). – P. 1272– 1278.
2. Eisner C.H., Somme Ph., Piorkowski C. et al. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Trial of Home Monitoring against Regular Follow-up in MADIT II Patients: Additional Visits and Cost Impact // Computers in Cardiology. – 2006. – No. 33. – P. 241–244.
3. Kohno R., Abe H., Oginosawa Y., Tamura M. et al. Reliability and characteristics of atrial tachyarrhythmias detection in dual chamber pacemakers // Circulation. – 2011. – No. 75. – P. 1090– 1097.
4. Ponikowski P., Voors A.A., Anker S.D. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure // Eur. Heart J. – 2016. – No. 37. – P. 2129–2200.
5. Schaldach M., Hutten. Telecardiology-optimizing the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of the next implant generation // Progress in Biomedical Research. – 1998. – No. 3. – P. 1–4.
6. Slotwiner D., Varma N., G. Akar J. et al. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices // Heart Rhythm. – 2015. – No. 12(7). – P. 69–95.
7. The EHRA White book. – 2014. – Р. 429–430.
8. Wilson D.G., Leventigiannis G., Barr C., Morgan J.M. ECG predictors of T wave oversensing in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators // Int. J. Cardiol. – 2016. – Vol. 23(220). – P. 27–31.
9. Бокерия О.Л., Испирян А.Ю. Мониторинг хронической сердечной недостаточности на дом // Анн. аритмологии. – 2012. – № 2(9). – C. 14–22.
Review
For citations:
Damrina E.V., Ilov N.N. FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH ICD: IN-CLINIC INTERROGATING OR REMOTE MONITORING? Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2017;32(1):84-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2017-32-1-84-87
Views:
360
.png)
Email this article 