Beta-adrenergic reactivity of erythrocyte membranes as a biomarker of the clinical phenotype of supraventricular reentrant tachycardias in children
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2026-41-1-132-139
Abstract
Introduction. Paroxysmal supraventricular reentrant tachycardias (PSRTs) are the most common class of tachyarrhythmias in childhood. Their clinical course is characterized by marked heterogeneity. The severity of clinical manifestations depends not only on the electrophysiological properties of the arrhythmia substrate but also on the individual reactivity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). Despite understanding the general role of the SNS, assessing its individual contribution in a particular patient remains challenging. Beta-adrenergic reactivity of erythrocyte membranes (β-ARM) is an integral marker of β-adrenergic receptor function and assesses their functional state in vitro based on the degree of membrane stabilization under the influence of a β-blocker. An increase in β-ARM (> 20 arbitrary units) is interpreted as a sign of receptor desensitization–an adaptive response to chronic hyperstimulation, which serves as an indirect marker of prolonged sympathetic hyperactivation.
Aim: To assess β-ARM levels in children with various forms of WPW and determine their relationship with the presence, frequency, and severity of clinical paroxysms.
Material and Methods. A single-center retrospective study included 38 children aged 7 to 17 years, including 15 (Group 1) with asymptomatic WPW syndrome and 23 (Group 2) with symptomatic WPW syndrome (WPW syndrome and AVNRT). β-ARM levels were determined photometrically by in vitro inhibition of hypotonic hemolysis with a nonselective β-blocker. Clinical severity was assessed using an original scoring system. Statistical analysis included the Mann – Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression.
Results. The level of β-adrenergic activity of erythrocyte membranes (β-ARM) was significantly higher in children with symptomatic supraventricular reentrant tachycardias compared to asymptomatic WPW phenomenon (21.5 ± 8.9 arbitrary units vs 14.2 ± 3.5 arbitrary units; p = 0.01). Each 1% increase in β-ARM increased the odds of a symptomatic course by 2.05 times (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.28–3.28; p = 0.003). Higher values of β-ARM were found in patients with paroxysms at rest (22.5 [20.8; 24.2] arbitrary units) compared to those with exercise (18.9 [16.1; 21.7] arbitrary units; p = 0.032), as well as in patients requiring drug relief (20.51 [17.70; 37.47] arbitrary units) compared to those spontaneously relieved (16.20 [10.44; 20.00] arbitrary units; p = 0.041). The most severe course, characterized by frequent, treatment-resistant, prolonged paroxysms with a high heart rate, is associated with the highest β-ARM level (32.6 [24.12; 38.62] arbitrary units; p = 0.009).
Conclusion. Elevated β-ARM levels, reflecting β-adrenergic receptor desensitization, are a statistically significant predictor of symptomatic PSRT course in children and are associated with a more severe clinical phenotype. Determination of β-ARM can serve as an additional non-invasive tool for risk stratification in children with asymptomatic WPW.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. V. YakimovaRussian Federation
Evgeniya V. Yakimova - Junior Research Scientist, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
L. I. Svintsova
Russian Federation
Liliya I. Svintsova - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
T. Yu. Rebrova
Russian Federation
Tatyana Yu. Rebrova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Scientist, Laboratory of Molecular Cell Pathology and Genodiagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
E. F. Muslimova
Russian Federation
Elvira F. Muslimova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Scientist, Laboratory of Molecular Cell Pathology and Genodiagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
O. Yu. Jaffarova
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Dzhaffarova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Scientist, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
S. A. Afanasyev
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Afanasyev - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Molecular Cell Pathology and Genodiagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC.
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
References
1. Obeyesekere M.N., Leong-Sit P., Massel D., Manlucu J., Modi S., Krahn A.D., et al. Risk of arrhythmia and sudden death in patients with asymptomatic preexcitation: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2012;125(19):2308–2315. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055350
2. Strangio A., Ielapi J., Sabatino J., De Sarro R., Di Costanzo A., Sportelli M. at al. Arrhythmias in pediatric age: a narrative review. Children (Basel). 2025;12(12):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12121580
3. Shen M.J., Zipes D.P. Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias. Circ. Res. 2014;114(6):1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.302549
4. Goldberger J.J., Arora R., Buckley U., Shivkumar K. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction: JACC focus seminar. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;73(10):1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.064
5. Motiejunaite J., Amar L., Vidal-Petiot E. Adrenergic receptors and cardiovascular effects of catecholamines. Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris). 2021;82(3–4):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2020.03.012
6. Cesur B., Elcik D., Cetinkaya Z., Kelesoglu S., Karabiyik U., Inanc M.T. et al. Association between excess catecholamine synthesis and polymorphic premature ventricular contraction. J. Electrocardiol. 2024;82:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.11.010
7. Lymperopoulos A., Rengo G., Koch W.J. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ. Res. 2013;113(6):739–753. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300308
8. Wallukat G. The beta-adrenergic receptors. Herz. 2002;27(7):683–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-002-2434-z
9. Perevoznikova Y.E., Svintsova L.I., Rebrova T.Yu., Dzhaffarova O.Yu., Yakimova E.V., Muslimova E.F., Afanasiev S.A. Vegetative state assessment in children with supraventricular arrhythmias before and after radiofrequency ablation. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2024;39(2):141–148. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2024-39-2-141-148
10. Workman A.J. Cardiac adrenergic control and atrial fibrillation. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2010;381(3):235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-009-0474-0
11. Meyer C., Kahle A.K., Dagres N., Derval N., Dewland T.A., Drago F. et al. Management of patients with atrial tachycardia: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of theESC, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace. 2025;27(12):euaf324. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf324
12. Shen M.J. The cardiac autonomic nervous system: an introduction. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2021;32(3):295–301. English. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-021-00776-1
13. Hayano J., Yuda E. Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2019;38(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0193-2
14. Abbas M., Miles C., Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. Rev. 2022;11:e20. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2022.09
15. Rudakova L.V., Batishcheva G.A., Nikitina T.N., Vetrova E.N. Spectrophoto and digital colorimetric determination indicator of beta-adrenoreactivity of erythrocyte membranes of patients with bronchial asthma. Applied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny). 2023;26(3):85–91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-9277-2023-26-3-85-91
16. Franciosi S., Perry F.K.G., Roston T.M., Armstrong K.R., Claydon V.E., Sanatani S. The role of the autonomic nervous system in arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Auton. Neurosci. 2017;205:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2017.03.005
17. Zhong X., Jiao H., Gao J., Teng J. Autonomic tone variations prior to onset of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2022;28:e934028. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.934028
18. Talishinsky A., Ajijola O.A., Khalsa S.S. Autonomic imbalance in cardiomyopathy and heart failure: from neurobiology to precision neuromodulation. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2025;27(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-025-02288-7
19. Kartofeleva E.O., Svintsova L.I., Dzhaffarova O.Yu., Yakimova E.V. Dyssynchrony cardiomyopathy in patients with Wolff – Parkinson – White syndrome: solved and unsolved problems.russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(9S):6309. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6309
Review
For citations:
Yakimova E.V., Svintsova L.I., Rebrova T.Yu., Muslimova E.F., Jaffarova O.Yu., Afanasyev S.A. Beta-adrenergic reactivity of erythrocyte membranes as a biomarker of the clinical phenotype of supraventricular reentrant tachycardias in children. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2026;41(1):132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2026-41-1-132-139
JATS XML


.png)
























