RULES AND PRINCIPLES OF PATIENT SELECTION FOR SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACQUIRED HEART DISEASES COMPLICATED BY ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2017-32-3-29-34
Abstract
The present article provides an overview of the latest guidelines and the principles of selecting the patients with acquired heart diseases complicated by atrial fibrillation (AF) for surgical treatment. The effectiveness of various methods of AF treatment in such patients is analyzed. The criteria for selecting patients of this group for an operation are described. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with AF is ineffective and even inappropriate in cases of valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease requiring surgical correction. Surgical treatment of the main heart pathology and concomitant AF ablation in these patients is preferable. When choosing tactics of intervention, it is necessary to consider not only the presence of the pathology itself, but also the baseline functional state of the elements of cardiac conduction system. The presence of initial sinus node dysfunction in patients with long-lasting persistent AF significantly increases the probability of pacemaker implantation and prolongs a patient’s stay in the intensive care unit.
About the Authors
V. V. Evtushenko
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. S. Makogonchuk
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Evtushenko
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Geeringa J.H., van der Kuip D.A., Hofman A. et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study // Eur. Heart J. — 2006. — Vol. 27. — P. 949–953.
2. Allessie M., Ausma J., Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation // Cardiovasc. Res. — 2002. — Vol. 54. — P. 230–246.
3. Shirohita-Takeshita A., Brundel B.J.J.M., Nattel S. Atrial fibrillation: basic mechanisms, remodeling and triggers // J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. — 2005. — Vol. 13. — P. 181–193.
4. Haissaguerre M. et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins // N. Engl. J. Med. — 1998. — Vol. 339(10). — P. 659–666.
5. Moe G.K. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation // Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. — 1962. — Vol. 140. — P. 183–188.
6. Cox J.L., Boineau J.P., Schuessler R.B. et al. From fisherman to fibrillation: an unbroken line of progress // Ann. Thorac. Surg. — 1994. — Vol. 58. — P. 1269–1273.
7. Клинические рекомендации ВНОА по проведению электрофизиологических исследований, катетерной аблации и применению имплантируемых антиаритмических устройств, 2013.
8. Bially D., Lehmann M., Schumacher D. et al. Hospitalization for arrhythmias in the United States: importance of atrial fibrillation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 1992. — Vol. 19. — P. 41A.
9. Johnson W.D., Ganjoo A.K., Stone C.D. et al. The left atrial appendage: our most lethal human attachment! Surgical implications // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 2000. — Vol. 17. — P. 718–722.
10. Shin H. et al. Effects of Atrial Fibrillation on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Flow // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 2003. — Vol. 23(2). — P. 175–178.
11. Almassi G.H., Schowalter T., Nicolosi A.C. et al. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? // Ann. Surg. — 1997. — Vol. 226. — P. 501–513.
12. D’Amato T.A., Savage E.B., Wiechmann R.J. et al. Reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass // Ann. Thorac. Surg. — 2000. — Vol. 70. — P. 2014–2116.
13. Valderrama A.L., Dunbar S.B., Mensah G.A. Atrial fibrillation: public health implications // Am. J. Prev. Med. — 2005 Dec. — Vol. 29(5), Suppl 1. — P. 75–80.
14. Wolowacz S.E., Samuel M., Brennan V.K. et al. The cost of illness of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the recent literature // Europace. — 2012. — Vol. 13. — P. 1375–1385.
15. Ezekowitz M.D., Netrebko P.I. Anticoagulation in management of atrial fibrillation // Curr. Opin. Cardiol. — 2003. — Vol. 18(1). — P. 26–31.
16. Calkins H., Reynolds M.R., Spector P. et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation // Circulation. — 2009. — No. 2. — P. 349–361.
17. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS // Eur. Heart J. — 2016. — Vol. 37. — P. 2893–2962 [Electronic resource] — doi: 10.1093/ eurheartj/ehw210.
18. Bergmann M.W. LAA occluder device for stroke prevention: Data on WATCHMAN and other LAA occluders // Trends Cardiovasc. Med. — 2017 Aug. — Vol. 27(6). — P. 435–446 [Electronic resource] — doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.03.006.
19. Holmes D.R., Jr., Kar S., Price M.J. et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 2014. — Vol. 64. — P. 1–12.
20. Meincke F., Schmidt-Salzmann M., Kreidel F. et al. New technical and anticoagulation aspects for left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN(R) device in patients not taking warfarin // EuroIntervention. — 2013. — No. 9. — P. 463–468.
21. Reddy V.Y., Mobius-Winkler S. et al. Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Watchman Device in Patients With a Contraindication for Oral Anticoagulation: The ASAP Study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 2013. — Vol. 61. — P. 2551–2556.
22. Melduni R.M. et al. Impact of LAA Closure during Cardiac Surgery // Circulation. — 2016 [Electronic resource] — doi: 10.1161/CIR-CULATIONAHA.116.021952.
23. Евтушенко А.В., Князев М.Б., Шипулин В.М. и др. Хирургическое лечение фибрилляции предсердий у пациентов с врожденными и приобретенными пороками сердца по материалам Томского НИИ кардиологии // Сиб. мед. журн. (Томск). — 2005. — № 2. — С. 79–85.
24. Евтушенко А.В., Евтушенко В.В., Петлин К.А. и др. Пути оптимизации достижения трансмуральности повреждения миокарда предсердий при радиочастотном воздействии // Вестн. аритмологии. — 2007. — № 48. — С. 15–21.
25. Евтушенко А.В., Евтушенко В.В., Петлин К.А. и др. Определение концепции повышения эффективности отдалённых результатов радиочастотной фрагментации предсердий по схеме «Лабиринт» на основании опыта двухсот операций // Вестн. аритмологии. — 2012. — № 69. — С. 5–11.
26. Евтушенко В.В., Евтушенко А.В., Петлин К.А. и др. Анатомо-физиологическая оценка роли различных атриотомических доступов при хирургических вмешательствах на митральном клапане в развитии наджелудочковых брадиаритмий в послеоперационном периоде // Клинич. физиология кровообращ. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 39–44.
27. Евтушенко А.В., Евтушенко В.В., Петлин К.А. и др. Перспективы восстановления функции синусового узла у пациентов после хирургического лечения длительно персистирующей фибрилляции предсердий // Сиб. мед. журн. (Томск). — 2014. — Т. 29, № 3. — С. 73–80.
28. Abhayaratna W. et al. Left Atrial Size: Physiologic Determinants and Clinical Applications // J. Am. Coll. Cardiology. — 2006. — Vol. 47. — P. 2357–2363.
29. Kawazoe K. et al. Surgical treatment of giant left atrium combined with mitral valvular disease. Plication procedure for reduction of compression to the left ventricle, bronchus and pulmonary parenchyma // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. — 1983. — Vol. 85. — P. 885–892.
30. Немков А.С., Сидорчук А.В. Нарушения сердечного ритма после протезирования митрального клапана // Вестн. хирургии. — СПб., 2009. — Т. 168, № 1. — С. 21–26.
31. Matsuda H. The causes of prolonged postoperative respiratory care in mitral valve disease with a giant left atrium // Kyobu Geka. — 1990. — Vol. 43(3). — P. 102–110.
32. Bertoli D., Filorizzo G. An unusual cardiomegaly: the giant left atrium // Clin. Cardiol. — 1998. — Vol. 21(12). — P. 918.
33. Scherer M. et al. Left atrial size reduction improves the sinus rhythm conversion rate after radiofrequency ablation for continuous atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery // Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. — 2006. — Vol. 54. — P. 34–38.
34. Yamanaka K., Sekine Y., Nonaka M. et al. Left atrial appendage contributes to left atrial booster function after the maze procedure: quantitative assessment with multidetector computed tomography // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 2010. — Vol. 38(3). — P. 361–365.
35. Pasic M., Musci M., Siniawski H. et al. The Cox MAZE III procedure: parallel normalization of sinus node dysfunction, improvement of atrial function, and recovery of the cardiac autonomic nervous system // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. — 1999. — Vol. 118. — P. 287–296.
36. Hyung Gon Je et al. Risk factors analysis on failure of maze: midterm results // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 2009. — Vol. 36. — P. 272–279.
37. Nery P.B., Fernandes R., Nair G.M. et al. Device-related infection among patients with pacemakers and implantable defibrillators: incidence, risk factors, and consequences // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. — 2010 July. — Vol. 21, No. 7. — P. 786–790.
38. Johansen J.B., Jørgensen O.D., Møller M. et al. Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patients // Eur. Heart J. — 2011 April. — Vol. 32, No. 8. — P. 991–998.
39. Benussi S., Galanti A., Zerbi V. et al. Electrophysiologic efficacy of irrigated bipolar radiofrequency in the clinical setting // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. — 2010. — Vol. 139(5). — P. 1131–1136.
40. Chang H.-Y., Lin Y.-J., Lo L.-W. et al. Sinus node dysfunction in atrial fibrillation patients: the evidence of regional atrial substrate remodeling // Europace. — 2013. — Vol. 15. — P. 205–211.
41. Elvan A., Wylie K., Zipes D.P. Pacing induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs // Circulation. — 1996. — Vol. 94(11). — P. 2953–2960.
42. Fareh S., Villemaire C., Nattel S. Importance of refractoriness heterogeneity in the enhanced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation induction caused by tachycardia-induced electrical remodeling // Circulation. — 1998. — Vol. 98. — P. 2202–2209.
43. Gomes J., Kang P. Coexistence of sick sinus rhythm and atrial flutter-fibrillation // Circulation. — 1981. — Vol. 63. — P. 80–86.
44. Halperin J.L., Hart R.G. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: new ideas, persisting dilemmas // Stroke. — 1988. — Vol. 19. — P. 937–941.
45. Blackshear J.L., Odell J.A. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation // Ann. Thorac. Surg. — 1996. — Vol. 61. — P. 755–759.
46. Szekely P. Systemic Embolism and Anticoagulant Prophylaxis in Rheumatic Heart Disease // Br. Med. J. — 1964. — No. 1. — P. 1209–1212.
47. Furberg C.D., Psaty B.M., Manolio T.A. et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study) // Am. J. Cardiol. — 1994. — Vol. 74. — P. 236–241.
48. Lee J.M.S., Kalman J.M. Sinus node dysfunction and atrial fibrillation: two sides of the same coin? // Europace. — 2013. — Vol. 15. — P. 161–162.
49. Moretti M., Fabris E., Morosin M. et al. Prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation and severity of symptoms of heart failure in patients with low gradient aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction // Am. J. Cardiol. — 2014. — Vol. 114. — P. 1722–1728.
50. Messika-Zeitoun D., Bellamy M., Avierinos J.F. et al. Left atrial remodelling in mitral regurgitation — methodologic approach, physiological determinants, and outcome implications: a prospective quantitative Doppler-echocardiographic and electron beam-computed tomographic study // Eur. Heart J. — 2007. — Vol. 28. — P. 1773–1781.
51. Calvo N., Bisbal F., Guiu E. et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation-induced tachycardiomyopathy in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation // Int. J. Cardiol. — 2013. — Vol. 168. — P. 4093–4097.
52. Edner M., Caidahl K., Bergfeldt L. et al. Prospective study of left ventricular function after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction in patients with atrial fibrillation // Br. Heart J. — 1995. — Vol. 74. — P. 261–267.
53. Gertz Z.M., Raina A., Saghy L. et al. Evidence of atrial functional mitral regurgitation due to atrial fibrillation: reversal with arrhythmia control // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 2011. — Vol. 58. — P. 1474–1481.
54. Ring L., Dutka D.P., Wells F.C. et al. Mechanisms of atrial mitral regurgitation: insights using 3D transoesophageal echo // Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging — 2014. — Vol. 15. — P. 500–508.
55. Vahanian A., Alfieri O., Andreotti F. et al., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 2012. — Vol. 42. — P. S1–44.
56. Melo J.Q., Neves J., Adragão P. When and how to report results of surgery on atrial fibrillation // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. — 1997. — Vol. 12(5). — P. 739–744.
57. Peretto G., Durante A., Limite L.R. et al. Postoperative Arrhythmias after Cardiac Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Therapeutic Management // Cardiol. Res. Pract. — 2014. — No. 1. — P. 615–627.
58. Teh A.W., Kistler P.M., Lee G. et al. Electroanatomic remodeling of the left atrium in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease // J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. — 2012. — Vol. 23. — P. 232–238.
59. Yeh Y.H., Burstein B., Qi X.Y. et al. Funny current downregulation and sinus node dysfunction associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia: a molecular basis for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome // Circulation. — 2009. — Vol. 119. — P. 1576–1585.
Review
For citations:
Evtushenko V.V., Makogonchuk I.S., Evtushenko A.V. RULES AND PRINCIPLES OF PATIENT SELECTION FOR SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACQUIRED HEART DISEASES COMPLICATED BY ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2017;32(3):29-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2017-32-3-29-34
Views:
718
.png)
Email this article 