RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION AFTER INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PERFORMED THROUGH THE RADIAL ACCESS. PREDICTORS, STRATEGY TO REDUCE FREQUENCY
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2018-33-3-9-16
Abstract
This review is devoted to anatomy of the radial artery, and its utilization as an access for interventional procedures. Also, the article depicts pathological mechanisms of the radial artery occlusion, ways of prevention and treatment of this complication.
About the Authors
D. V. Ognerubov
National Cardiology Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student of Catheterization Laboratory
15a, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
S. I. Provatorov
National Cardiology Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Pulmonary Hypertension and Other Heart Diseases
15a, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
E. V. Merkulov
National Cardiology Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Senior Researcher,
Catheterization Laboratory
15a, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
A. S. Tereshchenko
National Cardiology Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Researcher, Catheterization Laboratory
15a, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
A. N. Samko
National Cardiology Research Center of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Catheterization Laboratory
15a, 3rd Cherepkovskaya str., Moscow, 121552, Russian Federation
References
1. Bertrand O. F., Bélisle P., Joyal D., Costerousse O., Rao S. V., Jolly S. S., Meerkin D., Joseph L. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am. Heart J. 2012; 163(4): 632–648. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.015.
2. Sinha S. K., Mishra V., Afdaali N., Jha M., Kumar A., Asif M., Thakur R., Varma C. Coronary Angiography Safety between Transradial and Transfemoral Access. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2016; 2016:
3. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4013843.
4. Nardin M., Verdoia M., Barbieri L., Schaffer A., Suryapranata H., De Luca G. Radial vs Femoral Approach in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2017; 16(1): 79–92. DOI: 10.2174/1570161115666170504125831.
5. Mamas M. A., Fraser D. G., Ratib K., Fath-Ordoubadi F., El-Omar M., Nolan J., Neyses L. Minimising radial injury: prevention is better than cure. EuroIntervention. 2014; 10: 824–832. DOI: 10.4244/eijv10i7a142.
6. Abdelaal E., Brousseau-Provencher C., Montminy S., Plourde G., MacHaalany J., Bataille Y., Molin P., Déry J. P., Barbeau G., Roy L., Larose É., De Larochellière R., Nguyen C. M., Proulx G., Costerousse O., Bertrand O. F. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013; 6: 1129–1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019.
7. Merkulov E. V., Mironov V. M., Samko A. N. Coronary angiography, ventriculography, bypass angiography in illustrations and schemas. Moscow: Media-Medica; 2011: 18 (In Russ).
8. Ognerubov D., Provatorov S., Merkulov E., Tereshenko A., Arutyunyan G., Tripoten M., Pogorelova O., Balahonova T., Samko A. P2475. Method of non-pharmacological recanalization of acute radial artery occlusion after coronary angiography via transradial access. Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39, Issue suppl. 1. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy565.P2475.
9. Bertrand O. F., Rao S. V., Pancholy S., Jolly S. S., Rodés-Cabau J., Larose E., Costerousse O., Hamon M., Mann T. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 3: 1022–1031. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.013.
10. Pancholy S., Coppola J., Patel T., Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008; 72: 335–340. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21639.
11. Cubero J. M., Lombardo J., Pedrosa C., Diaz-Bejarano D., Sanchez B., Fernandez V., Gomez C., Vazquez R., Molano F. J., Pastor L. F. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009; 73: 467–472. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21900.
12. Sanmartin M., Gomez M., Rumoroso J. R., Sadaba M., Martinez M., Baz J. A., Iniguez A. Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007; 70: 185–189. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21058.
13. Pancholy S., Bernat I., Bertrand O., Patel T. Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization the PROPHET-II Randomized Trial Jacc. Card. Interv. 2016; 9(19): 1992–1999. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020.
14. Sakai H., Ikeda S., Harada T., Yonashiro S., Ozumi K., Ohe H., Ochiai M., Miyahara Y., Kohno S. Limitations of successive transradial approach in the same arm: the Japanese experience. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2001; 54: 204–208. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1268.
15. Barbeau G. R., Arsenault F., Dugas L., Simard S., Lariviere M. M. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulseoximetry and plethysmography: Comparison with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients. Am. Heart J. 2004; 147: 489–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.038.
16. Pancholy S. B. Transradial access in an occluded radial artery: New technique. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2007; 19: 541–544.
17. Feray H., Izgi C., Cetiner D., Men E. E., Saltan Y., Baltay A., Kahraman R. Effectiveness of enoxaparin for prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial cardiac catheterization. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2010; 29: 322–325. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-009-0352-0.
18. Pancholy S. B. Comparison of the effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am. J. Cardiol. 2009; 104(8): 1083–1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.057.
19. Plante S., Cantor W. J., Goldman L., Miner S., Quesnelle A., Ganapathy A., Popel A., Bertrand O. F. Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 76(5): 654–658. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22610.
20. Spaulding C., Lefevre T., Funck F., Thebault B., Chauveau M., Ben Hamda K., Chalet Y., Monségu H., Tsocanakis O., Py A., Guillard N., Weber S. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1996; 39: 365–370. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)81939-5.
21. Bernat I., Bertrand O. F., Rokyta R., Kacer M., Pesek J., Koza J., Smid M., Bruhova H., Sterbakova G., Stepankova L., Costerousse O. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am. J. Cardiol. 2011; 107(11): 1698–1701. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.056.
22. Dharma S., Kedev S., Patel T., Kiemeneij F., Gilchrist I. C. A novel approach to reduce radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: postprocedural/prehemostasis intra-arterial nitroglycerin. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015; 85: 818–825. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25661.
23. Lemmert M. E., Oldroyd K., Barragan P., Lesiak M., Byrne R. A., Merkulov E., Daemen J., Onuma Y., Witberg K., van Geuns R. J. Reduced duration of dual antiplatelet therapy using an improved drug-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main artery in a real-world, all-comer population: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized multicenter IDEAL-LM trial. Am. Heart J. 2017 May; 187: 104–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
24. Mont’Alverne Filho J. R., Assad J. A., Zago Ado C., da Costa R. L., Pierre A. G., Saleh M. H., Barretto R., Braga S. L., Feres F., Sousa A. G., Sousa J. E. Comparative study of the use of diltiazem as an antispasmodic drug in coronary angiography via the transradial approach. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2003; 81: 59–63. DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2003000900005.
25. Honda T., Fujimoto K., Miyao Y., Koga H., Hirata Y. Access site related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins. Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther. 2012; 27: 174–180. DOI: 10.1007/s12928-012-0108-1.
26. Dery J. P., Simard S., Barbeau G. R. Reduction of discomfort at sheath removal during transradial coronary procedures with the use of a hydrophilic-coated sheath. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2001; 54: 289–294. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1286.
27. Kindel M., Ruppel R. Hydrophilic-coated sheaths increase the success rate of transradial coronary procedures and reduce patient discomfort but do not reduce the occlusion rate: Randomized single-blind comparison of coated vs. non-coated sheaths. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2008; 97: 609–614. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-008-0658-5.
28. Rathore S., Stables R. H., Pauriah M., Hakeem A., Mills J. D., Palmer N. D., Perry R. A., Morris J. L. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: A randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 3: 475–483. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)62042-6.
29. Kaledin A. L., Kochanov I. N., Podmetin P. S., Seletskiy S. S., Ardeyev V. N., Garin Yu. Yu., Kozayev A. V., Ibragimov I. M. Distal part of the radial artery for endovascular interventions. Endovasc. Surg. 2017; 4(2): 125–133 (In Russ).
30. Uhlemann M., Mobius-Winkler S., Mende M., Eitel I., Fuernau G., Sandri M., Adams V., Thiele H., Linke A. Schuler G., Gielen S. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012; 5(1): 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.011.
31. Aminian A., Dolatabadi D., Lefebvre P., Zimmerman R., Brunner P., Michalakis G., Lalmand J. Initial experience with the glidesheath slender for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: A feasibility study with prospective radial ultrasound follow-up. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2014; 84(3): 436–442. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25232.
32. Aminian A., Saito S., Takahashi A., Bernat I., Jobe R. L., Kajiya T., Gilchrist I. C., Louvard Y., Kiemeneij F., van Royen N., van Leeuwen M., Yamazaki S., Matsukage T., Iglesias J. F., Rao S. V. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018; 00: 1–8. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27526.
Review
For citations:
Ognerubov D.V., Provatorov S.I., Merkulov E.V., Tereshchenko A.S., Samko A.N. RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION AFTER INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PERFORMED THROUGH THE RADIAL ACCESS. PREDICTORS, STRATEGY TO REDUCE FREQUENCY. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2018;33(3):9-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2018-33-3-9-16
Views:
1445
.png)
Email this article 