QUALITY OF CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH ST SEGMENT ELEVATION. REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE OF THE SIBERIAN INVASIVE CENTER
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2018-33-4-54-61
Abstract
Background. There are many quality indicators for evaluation of quality of care in patients with myocardial infarction in the USA and Europe, but no such indicators exist in Russia.
Material and Methods. This retrospective study included 475 STEMI patients, admitted within the first 12 hours during 2016. The baseline characteristics and treatment of our STEMI patients were compared with the OPERA register (France). The quality of care in STEMI patients was assessed using the quality criteria of the Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology. Thrombolytic therapy, primary PCI, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, acute LV aneurysm, and acute psychotic disorders were endpoints for a comparative assessment of quality of care in different age groups.
Results. The following was more frequent among patients of our center: female, history of MI, hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoker. Our patients were less likely to receive primary PCI and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, but more often thrombolytic therapy, LMWH, aspirin, inhibitor P2Y12, beta-blocker, ACEI/ARBs and statins. All eligible STEMI patients received reperfusion and recommended medication, but hospital mortality was higher than in the OPERA register (7.4% versus 4.6%; p<0.05). Senile STEMI patients are less likely to undergo invasive reperfusion due to severe comorbidity, dementia and acute psychotic disorders, which leads to a manifold increase in hospital mortality.
Conclusion. It is necessary to develop new devices for PCI of calcinated lesions, and methods for neuroprotection to overcome the existing barriers to ensure high-tech care in senile STEMI patients.
About the Authors
S. V. DemianovRussian Federation
PhD, Head of the Emergency Cardiology Department, Research Fellow of the Emergency Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
A. G. Syrkina
Russian Federation
PhD, Research Fellow of the Emergency Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
E. V. Vyshlov
Russian Federation
DM, Leading Research Fellow of the Emergency Cardiology Department
Associate Professor of Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
I. V. Maximov
Russian Federation
DM, Leading Research Fellow of the Emergency Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
A. E. Baev
Russian Federation
PhD, Head of the Division of Interventional Cardiology
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
V. A. Markov
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Leading Research Fellow of the Emergency Cardiology Department,
Professor of Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
R. S. Karpov
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
V. V. Ryabov
Russian Federation
DM, Professor, Scientific Director of the Emergency Cardiology Department
Head of Cardiology Department
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
References
1. Roger V. L., Go A. S., Lloyd-Jones D. M., Benjamin E. J., Berry J. D., Borden W. B., Bravata D. M., Dai S., Ford E. S., Fox C. S., Fullerton H. J., Gillespie C., Hailpern S. M., Heit J. A., Howard V. J., Kissela B. M., Kittner S. J., Lackland D. T., Lichtman J. H., Lisabeth L. D., Makuc D. M., Marcus G. M., Marelli A., Matchar D. B., Moy C. S., Mozaffarian D., Mussolino M. E., Nichol G., Paynter N. P., Soliman E. Z., Sorlie P. D., Sotoodehnia N., Turan T. N., Virani S. S., Wong N. D., Woo D., Turner M. B.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2012 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 125(1): 2–220. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046.
2. Markov V. A., Ryabov V. V., Maximov I. V., Vyshlov E. V., Demyanov S. V., Syrkina A. G., Belokopytova N. V., Shurupov V. S., Oyunarov E. O., Maximov A. I., Vasilyev A. G. Yesterday, today, tomorrow in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction. Siberian Medical Journal. 2011; 2: 8–13 (In Russ).
3. Erlikh A. D., Gratsiansky N. A., Participants of the RECORD registry. Independent registry of acute coronary syndromes RECORD. In hospital patients characteristic. Atherothrombosis. 2009; 1: 105–119.
4. Montalescot G., Dallongeville J., Belle E. V., Rouanet S., Baulac C., Degrandsart A., Vicaut E., STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different? 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition (the OPERA registry) Eur. Heart J. 2007; 28(12): 1409–1417. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm031.
5. Schiele F., Gale C. P., Bonnefoy E., Capuano F., Claeys M. J., Danchin N., Fox K. A. A., Huber K., Iakobishvili Z., Lettino M., Quinn T., Gimenez M. R., Bøtker H. E., Swahn E., Timmis A., Tubaro M., Vrints Ch., Walker D., Zahger D., Zeymer U., Bueno H. Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur. Heart J.: Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 2017 Feb; 6(1): 34–59. DOI: 10.1177/2048872616643053. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
6. Cannon C. P., McCabe C. H., Diver D. J., Herson S., Greene R. M., Shah P. K., Sequeira R. F., Leya F., Kirshenbaum J. M., Magorien R. D., Palmeri S. T., Davis V., Gibson C. M., Poole W. K., Braunwald E. Comparison of front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, anistreplase and combination thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of the
7. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1994; 24: 1602–1610.
8. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 2018 January 7; 39(Issue 2), 119–177. DOI: org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
Review
For citations:
Demianov S.V., Syrkina A.G., Vyshlov E.V., Maximov I.V., Baev A.E., Markov V.A., Karpov R.S., Ryabov V.V. QUALITY OF CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH ST SEGMENT ELEVATION. REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE OF THE SIBERIAN INVASIVE CENTER. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2018;33(4):54-61. https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2018-33-4-54-61