FEATURES OF THE ATTITUDE TOWARDS SMOKING IN CONNECTION WITH THE NATURE OF WORK AND MARITAL STATUS IN OPEN URBAN POPULATION: GENDER DIFFERENCES
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1-162-169
Abstract
Aim. To study the attitudes towards smoking in working-age men and women with different nature of work and marital status in Tyumen city.
Material and Methods. The cross-sectional epidemiological study was carried out as part of the cardiac screening in open urban male and female population. The study included 850 men (response rate 85.0%) and 704 women (response rate of 70.4%) aged 25–64 years. A self-report questionnaire of the World Health Organization titled «Knowledge and Attitude to Health» with a fixed list of answer options was used to analyze attitudes to smoking. Social status was assessed according to the nature of work (four categories: «unemployed and pensioners», «manual labour», «specialists and technical/engineering employees», and «leaders»), and marital status (have or do not have a life partner). Statistical analysis of the results was conducted using SPSS (11.5) and Statistica 7.0 software packages and Microsoft Excel spreadsheet software. Values were considered statistically significant when p was <0.05.
Results. The prevalence of smoking among single men was higher than the corresponding value in men who had a life partner (63.4 vs. 46.6%, р<0.001); the opposite trend was observed in women (13.1 vs. 17.0%, р>0.05). In regard to the nature of work, the highest smoking rate was found among men who were engaged in manual labour (m/f: 60.8/19.8%). Men from the categories of «specialists and technical/engineering employees» and «leaders» (40.7 and 41%) as well as women from the «unemployed and pensioners» category smoked less often (11.6%), (р<0.001). Gender differences in attitudes to smoking depended on marital status and the nature of work. Correlations between the nature of work and attempts to change something in smoking pattern were observed in men (R=0.35, p=0.05) and women (R=0.18, p=0.01).
Conclusion. According to the study of open urban population, significant differences were detected between men and women in regard to their attitudes towards smoking. Gender-related differences in the associations of smoking with marital status and the nature of work were identified.
About the Authors
E. I. GakovaRussian Federation
M.D., Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Scientist, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases,
111, Melnikaite str., Tyumen, 625026
M. M. Kayumova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Scientist, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases,
111, Melnikaite str., Tyumen, 625026
A. A. Gakova
Russian Federation
Research Assistant, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases,
111, Melnikaite str., Tyumen, 625026
M. Yu. Akimov
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Docent, the Department of Operaton of Motor Transport,
38, Volodarskogo str., Tyumen, 625000
V. A. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of Cardiology, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Deputy Director for Research, Head of the Scientific Department of Instrumental Research Methods,
111, Melnikaite str., Tyumen, 625026
V. V. Gafarov
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Psychological and Sociological Problems of Therapeutic Diseases,
175/1, B. Bogatkova str., Novosibirsk, 630089
References
1. Oganov R.G., Maslennikova G.Ya. Demographic trends in the Russian Federation: the impact of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(1):5–10 (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-9704-1110-0.
2. Maslennikova G.Y., Oganov R.G., Axelrod S.V., Boytsov S.A. Reducing mortality from cardiovascular and other non-communicable diseases in economies with high per capita income: the activity of not government institutions. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2015;14(6):5–9 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2015-6-5-9.
3. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: Implementing smoke-free environments. WHO. Geneva. 2009. URL: http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/2009/Appendix_VIII-table_1.pdf
4. Balanova Iu.A., Shal’nova S.A., Deev A.D., Kapustina A.V., Konstantinov V.V., Boytsov S.A. Smoking prevalence in Russia. What has changed over 20 years? Prevention Medicine. 2015;6:47–52 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/profmed201518647-52.
5. Corsi D.J., Boyle M.N., Lear S.A., Chow C.K., Teo K.K., Subramanian S.V. Trends in smoking in Canada from 1950 to 2011: progression of the tobacco epidemic according to socio-economic status and geography. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25 (Issue 1):45– 57. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0307-9.
6. Рак V.A., Gafarova A.V., Gafarov V.V., Gagulin I.V. Marital status as a category of social support, its relationship with psychosocial factors and CHD. The world of science, culture, education. 2010;3(22):183–185 (In Russ.). URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semeynoe-polozheniekak-kategoriya-sotsialnoy-podderzhki-ego-svyaz-s-psihosotsialnymifaktorami-i-ibs.pdf.
7. Lugo A., Gallus S., Edefonti V. Smoking prevalence and illicit cigarettes trade in 18 European countries. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2014 May;23(3):177– 185. URL: https://air.unimi.it/retrieve/handle/2434/222364/281554/Lugo_Abstract_SIB2013.pdf
8. Maksimov S.A., Indukaeva E.V., Artamonova G.V. Spread of smoking in the occupational groups of Western Siberia. Profilakticheskaja medicina = Preventive Medicine. 2015;18(1):28–31 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/profmed201518128-31.
9. Giovino G., Mirza S., Samet J., Gupta P., Jarvis M.J., Bhala N., et al. GATS Collaborative Group. Tobacco use in 3 billion individuals from 16 countries: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys. Lancet. 2012;380(Issue 9842):668–679. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61085-X.
10. Nelson D.E., Emont S.L., Brackbill R.M., Cameron L.L., Peddicord J., Fiore M.C. Cigarette smoking prevalence by occupation in the United States. A comparison between 1978 to 1980 and 1987 to 1990. J. Occup. Med. 1994;36(5):516–525. URL: http://journals.lww.com/joem/Abstract/1994/05000/Cigarette_Smoking_Prevalence_by_Occupation_in_the.9.aspx.
11. Gakova E.I., Akimova E.V., Kayumova M.M., Kuznetsov V.A. Gender differences in attitude towards smoking in working-age men and women of different levels of education and marital status in Tyumen city. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2017;5(16):57–62 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2017-5.
12. Denisova D.V., Kovalkova N.A., Kashtanova E.V., Polonskaya Ya.V., Sherbakova L.V. Smoking and its association with socio-economic and cardiometabolic risk factors in the population 25–45 year of Novosibirsk. The problem of female smoking (2013–2014). Atherosclerosis. 2014;10(3):61–66 (In Russ.).
13. Gakova E.I., Akimova E.V., Kuznetsov V.A. Epidemiology aspects of smoking among pupils (18 years of dynamics). Arterial’naya Gipertenziya = Arterial Hypertension. 2016;22(6):584–593 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18705/1607-419X-2016-22-6-584-593.
14. Osipova I.V., Simonova G.I., Kalinina I.V. Comparative evaluation of the importance of cardio metabolic risk factors in workers stressful profession. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika = Cardiovascular therapy and prevention. 2012; 11(3): 53–57 (In Russ.).
15. Boytsov S.A. Recent trends in and new data on the epidemiology and prevention of non-communicable diseases. Terapevticheskii arkhiv = Therapeutic Archive. 2016;1(88):4–10 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/terarkh20168814-10.
16. Amlaev K.R. Tobacco: epidemiology, clinic, treatment, prevention and normative regulation. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2018;13(2):426–430 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2018.13069.
17. Akimova Е.V., Akimov А.M., Gakova E.I., Kayumova M.M., Gafarov V.V., Kuznetsov V.A. Behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in men having different work patterns: Results of a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Preventive medicine. 2016;3:49–53 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/profmed201619349-53.
18. Burmistrova N.О., Burmistrov D.A. Smoking as a factor increasing the cost of the employer. Meždunarodnyj naučno-issledovatel’skij žurnal = International Research Journal. 2016;6(48), 4:106–108 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.48.074.
19. Cho H.J., Khang Y.H., Yun S.C. Occupational differentials in cigarette smoking in South Korea: findings from the 2003 Social Statistics Survey. J. Prev. Med. Public. Health. 2006;39(4):365–370.
20. Akimov A.M. Attitudes to smoking in open population depending on education and character of labor. The Siberian Medical Journal. 2014; 29(3):122–125 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29001/2073-8552-2014-29-3-122-125.
Review
For citations:
Gakova E.I., Kayumova M.M., Gakova A.A., Akimov M.Yu., Kuznetsov V.A., Gafarov V.V. FEATURES OF THE ATTITUDE TOWARDS SMOKING IN CONNECTION WITH THE NATURE OF WORK AND MARITAL STATUS IN OPEN URBAN POPULATION: GENDER DIFFERENCES. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019;34(1):162-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1-162-169