MORPHO-FUNCTIONAL CONDITION OF VENOUS CONDUITS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC HARVESTING
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-2-138-145
Abstract
Background. The morpho-functional integrity of the structures of the wall of the venous conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting is the guarantor of the functioning of autovenous bypass grafts in the long-term period. Allocating a vein in a flap with surrounding tissues ensures minimal effect on the vein with better results in the long-term, but it increases the risk of wound complications. Endoscopic vein harvesting contributes to a significant reduction in wound complications. However, according to literary data, this technique can negatively affect the bypass grafts passability due to the effects of mechanical manipulations and exposure to carbon dioxide. Previously, we developed a method for the endoscopic vein extraction in a flap with surrounding tissues that does not require carbon dioxide insufflation.
Aim. The aim of the study was to assess the morphological and functional changes in the vein fragments harvested by the new original endoscopic method compared to the traditional open harvesting technique.
Material and Methods. The fragments of the great saphenous vein were studied after endoscopic and open harvesting. From the access in the knee area, a 3–5 cm fragment of the vein was openly harvested and was then used for the biopsy in the control group. Next, the vein was harvested endoscopically and the fragments of this part of the vein comprised the study group. Light microscopy of the sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, was performed to assess the structural integrity of the venous walls; the expression of CD 31 and E-Cadherin was determined immunohistochemically to assess the viability and function of the endothelium.
Results. The results of histological study suggested that the endothelium was more intact in the segments harvested endoscopically; moreover, immunohistochemistry data showed that the endothelium was more viable in these segments.
About the Authors
Yu. Yu. VecherskyRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Leading Research Scientist, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
D. V. Manvelyan
Russian Federation
Graduate Student, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
N. V. Krakhmal
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Pathological Anatomy
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
V. V. Zatolokin
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Assistant, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
S. V. Gusakova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Dean of the Faculty of Medicine and Biology, Head of the Department of Biophysics and Functional Diagnostics
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
A. N. Dzyuman
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Morphology and General Pathology
2, Moskovsky tract, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
References
1. Dashwood M.R., Loesch A. Surgical damage of the saphenous vein and graft patency. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007;133(1):274–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.029.
2. Rousou L.J., Taylor K.B., Lu X.G., Healey N., Crittenden M.D., Khuri S.F., et al. Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;87:62–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.049.
3. Souza D.S., Christofferson R.H., Bomfim V., Filbey D. “No-touch” technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 1999;33(6):323–329.
4. Hussaini B.E., Lu X.G., Wolfe J.A., Thatte H.S. Evaluation of endoscopic vein extraction on structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelium. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.2011;6(1):82. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-82.
5. Bisleri G., Muneretto C. Endoscopic saphenous vein and radial harvest: state-of-the-art. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2015;30(6):624–628. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000231.
6. Vecherskij Ju.Ju., Zatolokin V.V., Petlin K.A., AhmedovSh.D., Shipulin V.M. New method of endoscopic isolation of the great saphenous vein in the open system. Angiologija i sosudistaja hirurgija=Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2017;23(2):131–136 (In Russ.).
7. Nezafati M.H., Nezafati P., Amoueian S., Attaranzadeh A., Rahimi H.R. Immunohistochemistry comparing endoscopic vein harvesting vs. open vein harvesting on saphenous vein endothelium. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2014;9(1):101. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-101.
8. Lavrenjuk O.V., Volkov A.M., Chernjavskij A.M., Pustovetova M.G. Morphological assessment of venous autograft (large saphenous vein) during coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2012;6 (In Russ.).
9. Hashmi S.F., Krishnamoorthy B., Critchley W.R., Walker P., Bishop P.W., Venkateswaran R.V., et al. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of human saphenous vein harvested by endoscopic and open conventional methods. Interactive cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2014;20(2):178–185. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu359.
10. Kopjar T., Dashwood M.R. Endoscopic versus “no-touch” saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a trade-off between wound healing and graft patency. Angiology. 2016;67(2):121–132. DOI: 10.1177/0003319715584126.
11. Vestweber D. VE-Cadherin: the major endothelial adhesion molecule controlling cellular junctions and blood vessel formation. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28(2):223–232. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.158014.
Review
For citations:
Vechersky Yu.Yu., Manvelyan D.V., Krakhmal N.V., Zatolokin V.V., Gusakova S.V., Dzyuman A.N. MORPHO-FUNCTIONAL CONDITION OF VENOUS CONDUITS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC HARVESTING. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019;34(2):138-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-2-138-145