Immediate results of using a frame-mounted xeno-pericardial bioprosthesis in mitral position with an Easy Change System
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2020-35-1-54-60
Abstract
Material and Methods. The implantation of the MedEng-BIO biological valve prosthesis to the mitral position was performed in 19 patients at the Cardiology Research Institute of Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Science (Tomsk, Russia) between February 2017 and January 2019. The average age of patients was 68.7 ± 5.4 years. The NYHA functional class was 2.61 ± 0.50. The average peak preoperative gradient was 18.3 ± 5.9 mmHg; the mean gradient was 7.1 ± 3.3 mmHg. All the patients underwent echocardiography to study the mitral valve, the left ventricular function, the left atrial (LA) size, and the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) preoperatively and before the discharge (14 days after the surgery on average).
Results. There were no statistically significant changes in the left ventricular function; the decreases in the LA sizes and the RVSP are shown in Table 2. The effective opening areas of the MedEng-BIO valves of the sizes 27, 29, and 31 were 3.2, 2.7, and 2.06 cm2, respectively.
Conclusions. The first experience of using the MedEng-BIO biological mitral valve prostheses demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes with the simplification of the implantation procedure and a possible decrease in the risk of postoperative complications in repeated interventions. However, more cases and more extended observations are needed to draw final and statistically significant conclusions on the effect and feasibility of this surgical procedure.
About the Authors
B. N. KozlovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Leading Research Scientist, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
K. A. Petlin
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
E. A. Kosovskikh
Russian Federation
Medical Resident, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
V. M. Shipulin
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
D. S. Panfilov
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
Yu. N. Chernykh
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Cardiologist, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012, Russian Federation
References
1. Ostrovskij Ju.P. Heart surgery. Moscow: Meditsinskaya literatura; 2007:576 (In Russ.).
2. Braunwald N.S., Cooper T., Morrow A.G. Complete replacement of the mitral valve: successful clinical application of a flexible polyurethane prosthesis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1960;40:111.
3. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery the “French correction”. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1983;86(3):323–337.
4. The task force for the management of valvular heart diseasr of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(7):103–155 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2018-7-103-155.
5. Mostafa E.A., El Midany A.A., Taha A.S., El-Aasy S.R., Doghish A.A., Helmy A. et al. On-X versus St Jude Medical Mechanical Prothesis in mitral position: are we moving forward in design technology? J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino). 2018;59(2):252–258. DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10044-3.
6. Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database Committee. Annual Report 1999. Durham, N.C.: STS; 2000:52.
7. Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database Committee. Shahian D.M., Peterson E.D. Data analyses of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Durham, N.C.; 2011.
8. Bokeria L.A., Gudkova R.G. Cardiovascular Surgery 2015. Diseases and congenital malformations of the circulatory system. Moscow: Publishing House NTS SSH after A.N. Bakuleva; 2016:208 (In Russ.).
9. Gammie J.S., Sheng S., Griffith B.P., Peterson E.D., Rankin J.S., O’Brien S.M. et al. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;87(5):1431–1437. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.064.
10. Goldstone A.B., Chiu P., Baiocchi M., Lingala B., Patrick W.L., Fischbein M.P. et al. Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1847–1857. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613792.
11. Khan S., Trento A., De Robertis M., Kass R.M., Sandhu M., Czer L.S. et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001;122(2):257–269. DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.115238
Review
For citations:
Kozlov B.N., Petlin K.A., Kosovskikh E.A., Shipulin V.M., Panfilov D.S., Chernykh Yu.N. Immediate results of using a frame-mounted xeno-pericardial bioprosthesis in mitral position with an Easy Change System. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2020;35(1):54-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2020-35-1-54-60