Immunological features of hyperuricemia and gout phenotypes
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2026-41-3-74-80
Abstract
Current phenotypic classification of hyperuricemia (HU) and gout is based on the presence/absence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals, clinical signs of gout, and tophi in individuals with elevated uric acid (UA) levels. It is hypothesized that the severity of subclinical inflammation may differ for HU and gout phenotypes.
Aim: To test the hypothesis of increasing systemic inflammation intensity with HU progresses in patients within the proposed phenotypic classification.
Material and Methods. 220 patients with HU (UA > 360 μmol/L) over 18 years of age were examined and divided into the following phenotypes: asymptomatic HU (AHU); AHU with MSU crystals (verified by ultrasound or synovial fluid analysis) (AHU+crystals); intermittent gout (G); tophaceous gout (G+tophi). Comparative characteristics of the groups included an assessment of the frequency of comorbidities, metabolic disorders, and the main laboratory parameters.
Results. According to phenotyping results, the group of patients with AHU consisted of 40 people (18.2%), AHU+crystals – 26 (11.8%), G – 111 (50.5%), G+tophi – 43 (19.5%). The age in the groups was comparable (p = 0.5). An increase in the incidence of arterial hypertension and nephrolithiasis was revealed in the series AHU – AHU+crystals – G – G+tophi (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.00006, respectively). There was a statistically significant sequential increase in the median value of IL-6 in the groups from AHU to G+tophi (p = 0.0001). Also, in patients with AHU without MSU crystals, the average serum level of IL-18 was lower than that in the G+tophi group (p = 0.01). The level of highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was statistically significantly different in patients with AHU compared to patients with G and G+ tophi (p = 0.04 in both cases). Correlation analysis revealed a weak positive association between UA and IL-6 levels (r = 0.14, p < 0.05) and UA and hsCRP levels (r = 0.26, p < 0.05) in the general group (n = 220). A weak correlation between IL-6 and UA levels was also observed within each group (p < 0.05 in all cases). A moderate positive correlation was also found between UA and IL-8 levels (r = 0.36, p < 0.05) in patients in the AHU group (n = 40).
Conclusions. The severity of chronic inflammation in HU is associated with the level of serum UA in the blood and the presence of MSU crystals, and increases during the progression from AHU to chronic tophaceous gout.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. S. EliseevRussian Federation
Maxim S. Eliseev - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
34a, Karshirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
M. N. Chikina
Russian Federation
Maria N. Chikina - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Scientist, Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
34a, Karshirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
Ya. I. Kuzmina
Russian Federation
Yаnina I. Kuzmina - Junior Research Scientist, Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
34a, Karshirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
S. I. Glukhova
Russian Federation
Svetlana I. Glukhova - Cand. Sci., Senior Research Scientist, Department of Scientific Activity Coordination, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
34a, Karshirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
References
1. Borghi C., Fogacci F., Cicero A.F. Crystal clear – part I: The role of uric acid in cardiorenal disease. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2025;142:106432. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2025.07.028
2. Eliseev M.S., Novikova A.M. Comorbidity in gout and hyperuricemia: prevalence, causes, prospects of urate lowering therapy. Therapeutic Archive. 2019;91(5):120–128. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2019.05.000232 EDN: TOBJUH
3. Subbu G.R., Tiwaskar M., Muruganathan A., Rajasekar R. Prehyperuricemia Deserves More Attention in this Era of Metabolic Explosion: A Review. J. Assoc. Physicians. India. 2025;73(4):69–74. DOI: 10.59556/japi.73.0905
4. Dalbeth N., House M.E., Aati O., et al. Urate crystal deposition in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia and symptomatic gout: a dual energy CT study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015;74(5):908–911. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206397
5. Dalbeth N., Stamp L. Hyperuricaemia and gout: time for a new staging system? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014;73(9):1598–1600. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205304
6. Zhang W.Z. Uric acid en route to gout. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2023;116:209–275. DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.05.003
7. Ruggiero C., Cherubini A., Ble A., et al. Uric acid and inflammatory markers. Eur. Heart J. 2006;27(10):1174–1181. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi879
8. Ali N. Serum Uric Acid as a Mediator of Insulin Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms and Metabolic Pathways. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2026;9(1):e70163. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.70163
9. Wu H., Wang Y., Ren Z., et al. Overnutrition-induced gout: An immune response to NLRP3 inflammasome dysregulation by XOD activity increased in quail. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1074867. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1074867
10. Estevez-Garcia I.O., Gallegos-Nava S., Vera-Pérez E., et al. Levels of Cytokines and MicroRNAs in Individuals With Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and Ultrasonographic Findings of Gout: A Bench-to-Bedside Approach. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 2018;70(12):1814–1821. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23549
11. Rosenthal A.K., Csuka M.E., Halverson P., McCarty D.J, MD: A Giant of Rheumatology. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2024;50(1):15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2023.08.001
12. Lu Y., Lu C., Chen P., et al. Association of systemic inflammatory response index with serum uric acid levels, hyperuricemia, and gout in adults aged 20 years and older in the United States: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(30):e43566. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043566
13. Peral-Garrido M.L., Gómez-Sabater S., Caño R., et al. Systemic inflammation in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia with sonographic crystal deposits, including a comparison with normouricaemia and gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025;64(4):1807–1816. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae533
14. Sproston N.R., Ashworth J.J. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:754. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00754
15. Yoshida K., Glynn R.J., Choi H.K., et al. Canakinumab's Effect Against Subsequent Gout Flares and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Causal Mediation Analysis. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 2023;75(4):817–824. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S549357
16. Zeng H., Zheng L., Wu D., et al. Exploring Immunological Determinants and Constructing a Predictive Model for for Diagnosis of Gout: Insights Into Immune Biomarkers. J Inflamm Res. 2025;18:14629–14647. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S549357
17. Chen Z., Guo Q., Zhang Y., et al. A systems immunology perspective on gout pathogenesis and its precision-targeted treatment strategies. Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1615914. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1615914. Erratum in: Front. Immunol. 2025;16:1713414. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1713414
18. Calabuig I., Martínez-Sanchis A., Andrés M. Sonographic Tophi and Inflammation Are Associated With Carotid Atheroma Plaques in Gout. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2021;8:795984. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.795984
19. Eliseev M.S. ACR management guidelines for the treatment of gout: What’s new and what’s controversial. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(2):129–133 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47360/1995-4484-2021-129-133 EDN: GPVEFY
20. Eliseev M.S., Chikina M.N., Kuzmina Y.I. Comparison of anamnestic and laboratory parameters in patients with different phenotypes of hyperuricemia (data from a pilot study). Medical alphabet. 2025;(28):22–26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33667/2078-5631-2025-28-22-26
Review
For citations:
Eliseev M.S., Chikina M.N., Kuzmina Ya.I., Glukhova S.I. Immunological features of hyperuricemia and gout phenotypes. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2026;41(3):74-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2026-41-3-74-80
JATS XML

.png)
.png)
























