PERCENTILE DISTRIBUTION OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN THE GENERAL WORKING-AGE POPULATION
https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1-145-151
Abstract
Objective. To study the gender- and age-specific percentile distribution of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in the unorganized urban working-age population.
Material and Methods. Presented data were obtained in the ESSE-RF study in the city of Tomsk (1,412 participants, 25–64 years old without cardiovascular diseases, 59% women). All the surveyed signed voluntary informed consent form to participate in the study. We studied distributions of the mean and maximum cIMT obtained by the automatic and manual measurements, respectively. An error probability of less than 5% was considered statistically significant.
Results. Both indicators of cIMT consistently increased with age in both gender groups. Maximum cIMT (max-cIMT) increased stronger than the mean cIMT (mean-cIMT). Compared with data obtained in other studies, the mean-cIMT estimates were distributed closer to the upper pole of the spectrum presented and increased stronger in 35–55-year-old men compared with those in the populations of Central and Southwestern Europe; the mean-cIMT estimates showed the most pronounced gender effect. Similar trends were identified in relation to the max-cIMT distribution.
Conclusion. Obtained data allowed for specific assessment of the individual cIMT values by gender and age within the framework of risk stratification among people of working age without cardiovascular diseases. Further studies aimed at clarifying the prognostic role of high cIMT values in general population, taking into account the influence of traditional and new cardiovascular risk factors, can broaden the understanding of the significance of vascular state assessment as one of the key points, linking risk factors to clinical events, for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in population.
About the Authors
Kaveshnikov KaveshnikovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Cardiology Research Institute,
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
V. N. Serebryakova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Cardiovascular Epidemiology,
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
I. A. Trubacheva
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Research Institute of Cardiology,
111a, Kievskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
References
1. Scientific Organizing Committee of the RF-ESSAY. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in different regions of Russia (ESSAY-RF). Rationale and study design. Preventive Medicine. 2013;6:25–34 (In Russ.).
2. McGill H.C., McMahan C.A., Herderick E.E., Tracy R.E., Malcom G.T., Zieske A.W., et al. Effects of coronary heart disease risk factors on atherosclerosis of selected regions of the aorta and right coronary artery. PDAY Research Group. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000;20(3):836845. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.3.836.
3. Boytsov S.A., Kukharchuk V.V., Karpov Yu.A., Sergienko I.V., Drapkina O.M., Semenova A.E., et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis as a risk factor of cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2012;11(3):82–86 (In Russ.).
4. Grau M., Subirana I., Marrugat J., Eloshua R. Percentiles of carotid intima-media thickness in a Spanish population with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Scientific letters. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2013;66(9):744–754. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.04.012.
5. Folsom A.R., Kronmal R.A., Detrano R.C., O’Leary D.H., Bild D.E., Bluemke D.A., et al. Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168(12):1333–1339. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1333.
6. Prati P., Tosetto A., Vanuzzo D., Bader G., Casaroli M., Canciani L., et al. Carotid intima media thickness and plaques can predict the occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2470–2476. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511584.
7. Johnsen S.H., Mathiesen E.B., Joakimsen O., Stensland E., Wilsgaard T., Løchen M.L., et al. Carotid atherosclerosis is a stronger predictor of myocardial infarction in women than in men: a 6-year follow-up study of 6226 persons: the Tromso Study. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2873–2880. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.487264.
8. Rosvall M., Janzon L., Berglund G., Engström G., Hedblad B. Incident coronary events and case fatality in relation to common carotid intima-media thickness. J. Intern. Med. 2005;257(5):430–437. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01485.x.
9. Lorenz M.W., von Kegler S., Steinmetz H., Markus H.S., Sitzer M. Carotid intima-media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke. 2006;37(1):87–92. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196964.24024.ea.
10. Piepoli M.F., Hoes A.W., Agewall S., Albus C., Brotons C., Catapano A.L., et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37(29):2315–2381.DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.037.
11. Stein J.H., Korcarz C.E., Hurst R.T., Lonn E., Kendall C.B., Mohler E.R., et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2008;21:93–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.011.
12. Balakhonova T.V., Tripoten M.I., Pogorelova O.A. Ultrasound methods of carotid intima-media thickness estimation. SonoAce Ultrasound. 2010; 21: 57–63 (In Russ.).
13. Chazova I.E., Trubacheva I.A., Zhernakova Yu.V., Oshchepkova E.V., Serebriakova V.N., Kaveshnikov V.S., Karpov R.S. The prevalence of arterial hypertension as a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases in one of the cities in Siberian Federal District. Systemic Hypertension. 2013;10(4):30–37 (In Russ.).
14. Touboul P.J., Hennerici M.G., Meairs S., Adams H., Amarenco P., BornsteinN., et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004–2006–2011). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012;34(4):290–296. DOI: 10.1159/000343145.
15. Howard G., Sharrett A.R., Heiss G., Evans G.W., Chambless L.E., Riley W.A., et al. Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness distribution in general populations as evaluated by B-mode ultrasound. ARIC Investigators. Stroke. 1993;24:1297–1304. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.24.9.1297.
16. Sinning C., Wild P.S., Echevarria F.M., Wilde S., Schnabel R., Lubos E., et al. Gutenberg-Heart Study. Sex differences in early carotid atherosclerosis (from the community-based Gutenberg-Heart Study). Am. J. Cardiol. 2011;107(12):1841–1847. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.318.
17. Perk J., De Backer G., Gohlke H., Graham I., Reiner Z., Verschuren M., et al. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). Eur. Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–1701. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092.
18. Grau M., Subirana I., Agis D., Ramos R., Basagaña X., Martí R., et al. Carotid intima-media thickness in the Spanish population: reference ranges and association with cardiovascular risk factors. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl. Ed). 2012;65(12):1086–1093. DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.04.026.
19. Kaveshnikov V.S., Serebryakova V.N., Trubacheva I.A., Zhernakova Yu.V., Balakhonova T.V., Shalnova S.A. Prevalence of increased carotid intimamedia thickness and the associated factors in the general employable population. The Siberian Medical Journal. 2016;31(4):69–75 (In Russ.).
20. Liao X., Norata G.D., Polak J.F., Stehouwer C.D., Catapano A., Rundek T., et al. Normative values for carotid intima media thickness and its progression: Are they transferrable outside of their cohort of origin? Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016;23(11):1165–1173. DOI: 10.1177/2047487315625543.
21. Malyutina S.K., Ryabikov A.N., Palekhina Y.Y., Shakhmatov S.G., Ryabikov M.N., Guseva V.P. Gender- and age-specific reference values for carotid intima-media thickness in the typical population of Russia. Ultrasound and functional diagnostics. 2015;5S:107b (In Russ.).
22. Tosetto A., Prati P., Baracchini C., Manara R., Rodeghiero F. Ageadjusted reference limits for carotid intima-media thickness as better indicator of vascular risk: population-based estimates from the VITA project. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2005;3(6):1224–1230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01440.x.
23. Tzou W.S., Douglas P.S., Srinivasan S.R., Bond M.G., Tang R., Li S., et al. Distribution and predictors of carotid intima-media thickness in young adults. Prev. Cardiol. 2007;10(4):181–189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-037X.2007.06450.x.
24. Johnsen S.H., Ellisiv B.M. Ultrasound imaging of carotid atherosclerosis in a normal population. The Tromso Study. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2009;19(1):17–28.
25. Baldassarre D., Nyyssonen K., Rauramaa R., de Faire U., Hamsten A., Smit A.J., et al. IMPROVE study group. Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data to identify the major determinants of carotid intima-media thickness in a European population: the IMPROVE study. Eur. Heart J. 2010;31:614–622. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp49.
Review
For citations:
Kaveshnikov K., Serebryakova V.N., Trubacheva I.A. PERCENTILE DISTRIBUTION OF CAROTID INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS IN THE GENERAL WORKING-AGE POPULATION. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019;34(1):145-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1-145-151