Additional parameters of myocardial perfusion imaging in the detection of multivessel coronary artery lesions (case report)

Myocardial perfusion imaging is included in the diagnostic algorithm in management of chronic coronary syndromes. However, in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) this method can demonstrate false-negative result, which, in case of low pretest probability of CAD and mild symptomatology, can lead to errors in diagnostic tactics. The presented clinical case demonstrates the significance of analysis of additional parameters of myocardial perfusion imaging on the example of a patient with multivessel coronary artery disease and the phenomenon of balanced ischemia, in which the left ventricular perfusion has an almost normal perfusion. A 58-year-old patient has main complaints of dyspnea and blood pressure elevations up to 170/100 mmHg. The calculated pre-test probability of coronary heart disease was 20%. Rest ECG, echocardiography showed no significant abnormalities. According to the guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, the patient was referred for noninvasive stress testing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. According to the study results, the size of reversed perfusion defect was 3% of the left ventricle, which is defined as a moderate risk of adverse cardiovascular events. However, extended analysis of myocardial perfusion data, such as transient ischemic dilatation index, stress-induced dynamics of left ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion and mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricle, as well as the presence of coronary calcium allowed to suspect multivessel coronary artery disease in the patient, which was the reason for coronarography and subsequent revascularization.

1. Bryer E., Stein E., Goldberg S. Multivessel coronary artery disease: The limitations of a “One-Size-Fits-All” approach. Mayo. Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual. Outcomes. 2020;4(6):638–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo

2. Obedinskiy A.A., Obedinskaya N.R., Nikitin N.A., Sirota D.A., Krestyaninov O.V. Multivessel coronary bed lesion in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Current state of the problem and gap in evidence. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2022;37(2):28–34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2022-37-2-28-34

3. Barbarash O.L., Karpov Yu.A., Panov A.V., Akchurin R.S., Alekyan B.G. et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Stable coronary artery disease. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(9):6110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6110

4. Vrints C., Andreotti F., Koskinas K.C., Rossello X., Adamo M., Ainslie J. et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–3537. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177

5. Perdoncin M., Ezeh E., Panta U.R., Mader J. Negative stress test is not always negative: revisiting the clinical implications of balanced ischemia. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30285. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30285

6. Nakanishi R., Gransar H., Slomka P., Arsanjani R., Shalev A., Otaki Y. et al. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2016;23(3):530–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0150-3

7. Czaja M.Z., Wygoda Z., Duszańska A., Szczerba D., Głowacki J., Gąsior M. et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy – interpretation of gated imaging. Part 2. Kardiochir. Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018;15(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2018.74676

8. Dorbala S.,Ananthasubramaniam K.,Armstrong I.S., Chareonthaitawee P., DePuey E.G., Einstein A.J. et al. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018;25(5):1784–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-0181283-y

9. Alama M., Labos C., Emery H., Iwanochko R.M., Freeman M., Husain M. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of transient ischemic dilation (TID) in myocardial perfusion imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018;25(3):724–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1040-7

10. Miller R.J.H., Hu L.H., Gransar H., Betancur J., Eisenberg E., Otaki Y. et al. Transient ischaemic dilation and post-stress wall motion abnormality increase risk in patients with less than moderate ischaemia: analysis of the REFINE SPECT registry. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2020;21(5):567–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez172

11. Shipulin V.V., Andreev S.L., Pryakhin A.S., Mochula A.V., Maltseva A.N., Sazonova S.I. et al. Low-dose dobutamine stress gated blood pool SPECT assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a feasibility study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2022;49(7):2219–2231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05714-y

12. Hida S., Chikamori T., Tanaka H., Igarashi Y., Shiba C., Hatano T. et al. Postischemic myocardial stunning is superior to transient ischemic dilation for detecting multivessel coronary artery disease. Circ. J. 2012;76(2):430–438. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-11-0946

13. Liu B., Yu W., Wang J., Shao X., Zhang F., Yang M. et al. Incremental value of regional wall motion abnormalities for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease by rest-only electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computerized tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in suspected coronary artery disease patients. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021;42(3):276–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001335

14. Chen J., Garcia E.V., Folks R.D., Cooke C.D., Faber T.L., Tauxe E.L. et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2005;12(6):687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.06.088

15. Shipulin V.V., Gonchikova E.V., Polikarpov S.A., Mochula A.V. Association of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony indices with data of dynamic singlephoton emission computed tomography of the myocardium: the role of the time interval between the stress test and recording. Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2024;39(2):149–159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2022-756

16. Jiang Z., Tang H., Shi J., Zhou Y., Wang C., Li D. et al. Myocardial stunning-induced left ventricular dyssynchrony on gated singlephoton emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2018;39(8):725–731. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000870

17. Ebaid N.Y., Khalifa D.N., Ragheb A.S., Abdelsamie M.M., Alsowey A.M. Validation of Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CADRADS) and Application of Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) as new standardized tools in the management of coronary artery disease patients. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021;14:7503–7514. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S336662